IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/globco/qt28f568zv.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Trajectory of China’s Industrial Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Naughton, Barry
  • Xiao, Siwen
  • Xu, Yaosheng

Abstract

China’s industrial policy does not fit well into traditional concepts of industrial policy, and even clear definitions of China’s industrial policy are rare. Everybody seems to agree that China has an aggressive industrial policy, but there is surprisingly little discussion about what that industrial policy is. To some extent, this is because China’s industrial and technology policies have been in a constant state of flux since the mid-2000s. In this short piece, we situate Chinese industrial policy and then argue that most of the process of restless change can be incorporated into a trajectory of two dimensions: first, the build out of a policy/planning mechanism; and second a shift in the ultimate objective of technology and industry polices from economics to security. We argue that these two simple features are robust enough to bear the weight of most characteristics of Chinese industrial policy. We then discuss the most recent phase of China’s industrial policy, characterized by a focus on security and new implementing instruments such as the “new-style national team” and the strengthening of the “national strategic science and technology force” (NSS&TF). These are clearly the culmination of the trends described earlier. Since there is still much we do not know about these very recent innovations, longer-run trends are invaluable in suggesting a hypothetical framework for current institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Naughton, Barry & Xiao, Siwen & Xu, Yaosheng, 2023. "The Trajectory of China’s Industrial Policies," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt28f568zv, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:globco:qt28f568zv
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/28f568zv.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences; industrial policy; China; science; technology; and innovation; national security;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:globco:qt28f568zv. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/igcc/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.