IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdi/wpaper/133.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le choix des projets d'investissements publics: limites de l'analyse coûts-avantages et intérêt d'une approche planificatrice. Application au secteur de la santé

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Pierre FOIRRY

    (Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Développement International(CERDI))

Abstract

The quest for equity, sustainability and applicability, among other things, has put the conventional Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) technique under fierce attack in the recent past. Attack concerns the Effects method as well as the Shadow price methods : even though they have not the same goals, they are interchangeable. However, usefullness and credibility of CBA can be increased if two conditions are taken into consideration : the first condition is to adopt a multi-approach with some complementary criterions : financial viability, economic efficiency, social equity, environmental sustainability,…… ; the second condition is to put into practice a development planning and to decentralize program and project planning. Health sector in a developing country is used as a relevant example to explain and give concrete expression to the processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pierre FOIRRY, 2000. "Le choix des projets d'investissements publics: limites de l'analyse coûts-avantages et intérêt d'une approche planificatrice. Application au secteur de la santé," Working Papers 200004, CERDI.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdi:wpaper:133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://publi.cerdi.org/ed/2000/2000.04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdi:wpaper:133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Mazenod (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceauvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.