IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cch/wpaper/150014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modelling Budget Impact: Analytical Techniques When Limits on Cost-Sharing are Imposed on Skewed Health Expenditure Data

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Nauenberg
  • Mary MacLennan

Abstract

Decision-makers often request costing models of multi-tiered benefit programs, such as those involving different levels of cost-sharing at each tier of expenditure. This situation presents particular modelling problems as health expenditure data available from related programs are likely to be positively skewed with non-constant variance. Based on the results of a Monte Carlo simulation producing 50 log-normal expenditure distributions, this paper provides a method for working with such data to produce cost estimates that utilize a composite measure referred to as the anchored distance - a standardized measure of the range over which the tier is defined. This measure helps to determine a measure of central tendency of a tier equivalent to that of the tier's mean expenditure for the purposes of determining a unit price within each tier of a distribution of expenditures. The empirical results suggest that every one unit increase in the anchored distance results in a 26% shift to the left of the central tendency from the tier's median value. Further, this estimate is, on average, just 0.6% different from the actual mean price for the tier. This measure as well as that of a suggested measure of quantity are particularly useful as decision-makers vary the range over which cost-sharing is applied because they are simple to recalculate without requiring access to the complete expenditure data. This technique should assist economists who attempt to model statistically valid budget impact analyses using such data.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Nauenberg & Mary MacLennan, 2015. "Modelling Budget Impact: Analytical Techniques When Limits on Cost-Sharing are Imposed on Skewed Health Expenditure Data," Working Papers 150014, Canadian Centre for Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:cch:wpaper:150014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.canadiancentreforhealtheconomics.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Nauenberg-et-al.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    expenditures; skewed data; budget impact; cost-sharing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cch:wpaper:150014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Rohit Dass (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cchetca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.