IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cbt/econwp/25-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Addressing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Incidentally via Collaboration with Larger Farms: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Agricultural nonpoint source pollution (ANSP) from farmers’ use of chemical fertilizers is one of the outstanding problems in resource management across the world. Alongside the three traditional policy responses of encouraging voluntary adoption of best management practices (BMP’s), weakly enforced command and control, or economic incentives over what can be observed, we consider a fourth approach of incidental ANSP pollution control. Here small farms may voluntarily adopt BMP’s and reduce excessive fertilizer as an incidental by-product of changing production to increase profit or reduce risk. We examine specifically the option for smaller scale crop farms in Sichuan Province China to collaborate with large or new agricultural operations (LNAO’s). Collaboration can take the form of 1) technical assistance for payment or as part of 2) production orders, or 3) temporarily providing land, labour or capital in exchange for payment or share of profit. Evaluating the effects of small farms’ voluntary collaboration on their fertilizer use is hampered by their self-selection to enter such arrangements, and by their potential hesitancy to honestly reveal their (high) levels of fertilizer use. In this paper, we use 364 proximity surveys of 3528 small crop farmers located in villages primarily in Sichuan Province, China, regarding their production methods, output, and collaboration. The surveys are conducted by undergraduate/masters students from the same villages, to increase trust and encourage honest reporting of fertilizer use. We use propensity score matching (PSM) to compare the fertilizer use of farmers who do collaborate, against 1) observably matched farmers who do not, then 2) against more narrowly matched non-collaborators who express a desire to collaborate, or 3) against matched non-collaborators whose villages do not contain LNAO’s with whom to collaborate, or finally 4) against matched non-collaborators who satisfy both conditions. We find robust evidence that small farmers use substantially less nitrogen or total chemical fertilizer if they collaborate with LNAO’s via production orders. In our most credible specification, such collaboration causes small farmers to reduce their total chemical fertilizer use by 27.7%, or by 30.4 kg/Mu from a sample mean of 109.9 kg/Mu. In contrast, we find only mixed evidence of effect if farmers collaborate via technical assistance, and no significant effect if they collaborate via supplying inputs for payment or profit share.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunlin Hua & Zejun Li & Jeremy Clark, 2025. "Addressing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Incidentally via Collaboration with Larger Farms: Evidence from China," Working Papers in Economics 25/03, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:25/03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.canterbury.ac.nz/cbt/econwp/2503.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural nonpoint source pollution (ANPS); Best management practices (BMPs); Voluntary collaboration; Fertilizer use reduction; Propensity score matching (PSM);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:25/03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Albert Yee (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decannz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.