IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cbt/econwp/23-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Much Does Dysphagia Cost? An Estimation of the Additional Annual Cost of Dysphagia in Patients Hospitalised with Stroke

Author

Listed:

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stroke-related dysphagia poses a substantial challenge, both in terms of its prevalence and the economic costs associated with its management. Despite its significance, there is a lack of comprehensive studies focusing on the economic burden of stroke-related dysphagia in the New Zealand context. The aims of this research are to estimate the economic costs and quality of life of patients with stroke-related dysphagia in New Zealand, emphasising the importance of understanding and addressing this issue from a healthcare management perspective. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the REGIONS Care study, a New Zealand wide sample of all patients hospitalised with stroke within a 6-month period (between 1st May 2018 and 30th October 2018) including follow-up up to 12 months. Patients were identified as dysphagic if they received a swallow screen during hospital admission and were seen by a Speech Language Therapist (SLT). Severe dysphagia was identified if the patients had a nasogastric feeding tube during their hospital admission and were seen by an SLT. Optimal linear propensity score matching was utilised to acquire a better counterfactual group for dysphagic stroke patients. All cost estimates were converted to NZ$2021 to compare to existing literature. RESULTS: Of all patients with stroke in the REGIONs Care study, 40% (952/2,379) were identified as dysphagic and 5% (119/2,379) as severely dysphagic. Using these percentages and the total number of reported strokes in 2021/22 in New Zealand, we estimated that 3,588 were dysphagic and 449 were severely dysphagic. These stroke-related dysphagic patients in 2021 presented a total additional cost of $89.6 million to New Zealand society, or a marginal cost of $25,000 per dysphagic patient. This estimate includes the additional hospitalisation costs ($16,100), community rehabilitation services ($1,370), hospital-level aged residential care ($4,030) and reduced quality of life (QoL) over a 12-month period post-hospital admission ($3,470). The total marginal cost of severely dysphagic stroke -related patients was $19.9 million overall, or $44,300 per patient. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The costs derived from the REGIONS Care study and the estimates of reduced QoL due to dysphagia provide a novel contribution for New Zealand, and internationally. While there is international literature estimating the marginal cost of dysphagic stroke-related hospitalisation, few extend this analysis to post-hospitalisation care and even fewer to the costs of reduced QoL. By quantifying this economic burden, we can advocate for improved dysphagia management strategies and ultimately enhance the overall quality of care for stroke survivors.

Suggested Citation

  • Shnece Duncan & Andrea Menclova & Maggie-Lee Huckabee & Dominique Cadilhac & Anna Ranta, 2023. "How Much Does Dysphagia Cost? An Estimation of the Additional Annual Cost of Dysphagia in Patients Hospitalised with Stroke," Working Papers in Economics 23/16, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:23/16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.canterbury.ac.nz/cbt/econwp/2316.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N J Devlin & P Hansen & P Kind & A H Williams, 2000. "The health state preferences and logistical inconsistencies of New Zealanders: a tale of two tariffs," Working Papers 180chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqueline Cumming, 2015. "Health Economics and Health Policy: Experiences from New Zealand," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 281-289, June.
    2. Henry Bailey & Mathieu F Janssen & Althea La Foucade & Paul Kind, 2019. "EQ-5D-5L population norms and health inequalities for Trinidad and Tobago," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. David Parkin & Nancy Devlin, 2006. "Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost‐utility analysis?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(7), pages 653-664, July.
    4. M. F. Janssen & A. Szende & J. Cabases & J. M. Ramos-Goñi & G. Vilagut & H. H. König, 2019. "Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L: a cross-country analysis of population surveys for 20 countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(2), pages 205-216, March.
    5. Richard Milne & Kathy Heaton-Brown & Paul Hansen & David Thomas & Vernon Harvey & Alison Cubitt, 2006. "Quality-of-Life Valuations of Advanced Breast Cancer by New Zealand Women," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 281-292, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Dysphagia; stroke-related; economic cost; quality of life; New Zealand;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:23/16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Albert Yee (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decannz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.