IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bwp/bwppap/8909.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Development and Surplus Labour: A Critical Review of the Lewis Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobing Wang
  • Jenifer Piesse

Abstract

The Lewis dual economy model is widely recognised in development economics for its profound explanatory power and applications in economic development. However, there remain some confusions and ambiguities, especially with respect to the definition of surplus labour and the wage determination mechanisms in both the traditional and modern sectors. This has prohibited its use, especially in empirical studies. This paper clarifies and extends this theory. Several questions are addressed. Firstly, it defines two types of surplus labour. Second, it considers the pattern of production and of population growth in the traditional agricultural sector to define the subsistence level of consumption. Third, it considers two wage determination mechanisms in the modern sector, which are then applied to the relationships between these mechanisms and labour market restrictions. Fourth, the role of agriculture and food supply is discussed. Fifth, it considers the dynamics of surplus labour and labour transfer, and defines two types of turning points, which have important implications for empirical studies. Sixth, a scenario for urban surplus labour is presented. In summary, the paper seeks to enhance the general level of understanding of the Lewis model and its application to the process of economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobing Wang & Jenifer Piesse, 2009. "Economic Development and Surplus Labour: A Critical Review of the Lewis Model," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 8909, GDI, The University of Manchester.
  • Handle: RePEc:bwp:bwppap:8909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/gdi/publications/workingpapers/bwpi/bwpi-wp-8909.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elkhan Richard Sadik‐Zada, 2021. "Natural resources, technological progress, and economic modernization," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 381-404, February.
    2. Saad, Suhaila & Mohamed Nor, Norashidah, 2018. "Health Expenditure and Economic Development in Low-and Middle-Income Countries," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 52(3), pages 181-189.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bwp:bwppap:8909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rowena Harding (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wpmanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.