IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/btx/wpaper/0926.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foreign Taxes, Domestic Income, and the Jump in the Share of Multinational Company Income Abroad

Author

Listed:
  • Harry Grubert

    (U.S. Treasury)

Abstract

Since 1996 the foreign share of U.S. multinational corporations’ worldwide income has risen sharply. For example, in a sample of large nonfinancial MNCs, the aggregate foreign share increased from 37.1 percent in 1996 to 51.1 percent in 2004. This increase is decomposed into its major sources, and the role of taxes in each component is evaluated. We also examine the sources of the decline in average effective foreign tax rates, such as the introduction of the check-the-box provisions in 1997. The basic components of the 14.0 percentage point change are the increase in domestic losses (6.0 percent), the increase in companies’ worldwide profits holding their share constant at the 1996 level (5.0 percentage points) and finally letting each company’s foreign share change (3.0 percentage points). There is some evidence that lower average foreign tax rates in 2004 were associated with greater domestic losses but it probably contributed no more than 1 percentage point of the 6.0 percentage point component. The very rapid income growth of companies that already had a large foreign share in 1996, which explains the 5.0 percentage point second component, raises the question as to the role of taxes in determining each company’s share in 1996. In fact a company’s average effective foreign tax rate had an important effect, particularly on foreign and domestic profit margins. Domestic profit margins were higher if the average foreign tax rate was higher. The difference between average foreign effective rates and the U.S. effective rate seems to explain 3 to 4 percentage points of the 5 percentage point component. Finally the reduction in average foreign effective tax rates, of about 5.0 percentage points from 1996 to 2004, explains about 2.0 percentage points of the 3.0 percentage point change in foreign share component. This was all through the impact on foreign and domestic profit margins and not through a shift in sales. Indeed there was a major shift in foreign and domestic profit margins on sales over the period, with mean foreign profit margins rising by 5.0 percentage points and falling by 2.0 percentage points at home. In examining the sources of the decline in average effective foreign tax rates, we conclude that the ‘check-the-box’ provisions enabled U.S. companies to reduce their foreign tax burdens by about 2.0 percentage points. The active finance exception, which permitted U.S. companies to defer income from a financial business, also introduced in 1997, contributed about another percentage point to the decline in foreign rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry Grubert, 2009. "Foreign Taxes, Domestic Income, and the Jump in the Share of Multinational Company Income Abroad," Working Papers 0926, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    • Handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:0926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Business_Taxation/Docs/Publications/Working_Papers/Series_09/WP0926.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosanne Altshuler & Harry Grubert, 2005. "The Three Parties in the Race to the Bottom: Host Governments, Home Governments and Multinational Companies," CESifo Working Paper Series 1613, CESifo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel N. Shaviro, 2009. "Planning and Policy Issues Raised by the Structure of the U.S. International Tax Rules," Working Papers 0915, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan J. Auerbach, 2006. "The Future of Capital Income Taxation," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 27(4), pages 399-420, December.
    2. Rosanne Altshuler & Alan J. Auerbach & Michael Cooper & Matthew Knittel, 2009. "Understanding US Corporate Tax Losses," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 23, pages 73-122, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Heijdra, Ben J. & Ligthart, Jenny E., 2010. "The Transitional Dynamics Of Fiscal Policy In Small Open Economies," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Kenneth J. Klassen & Stacie K. Laplante, 2012. "Are U.S. Multinational Corporations Becoming More Aggressive Income Shifters?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 1245-1285, December.
    5. Finér, Lauri & Ylönen, Matti, 2017. "Tax-driven wealth chains: A multiple case study of tax avoidance in the finnish mining sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 53-81.
    6. Navarro Aitor, 2021. "Jurisdiction Not to Tax, Tax Sparing Clauses, and the OECD Minimum Taxation (GloBE) Proposal," Nordic Tax Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2021(1), pages 6-19, October.
    7. John Mutti & Harry Grubert, 2009. "The Effect of Taxes on Royalties and the Migration of Intangible Assets Abroad," NBER Chapters, in: International Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization, pages 111-137, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Niels Johannesen, 2011. "Strategic Line Drawing between Debt and Equity," EPRU Working Paper Series 2011-04, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    9. Damgaard, Jannick & Elkjaer, Thomas & Johannesen, Niels, 2024. "What is real and what is not in the global FDI network?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Leibrecht, Markus & Rixen, Thomas, 2020. "Double Tax Avoidance and Tax Competition for Mobile Capital," SocArXiv dgw5k, Center for Open Science.
    11. Dhammika Dharmapala, 2008. "What problems and opportunities are created by tax havens?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 661-679, winter.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/179 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Dhammika Dharmapala, 2020. "Do Multinational Firms Use Tax Havens to the Detriment of Other Countries?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8275, CESifo.
    14. Niels Johannesen, 2012. "Cross-border hybrid instruments," EPRU Working Paper Series 2012-02, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    15. Kale, Jayant R. & Ryan, Harley E. & Wang, Lingling, 2019. "Outside employment opportunities, employee productivity, and debt discipline," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 142-161.
    16. Krishanu Karmakar & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2014. "Fiscal Competition versus Fiscal Harmonization: A Review of the Arguments," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1431, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    17. Nora Alice Paulus, 2022. "The anti‐tax‐avoidance directive: An initiative to successfully curb profit shifting?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(3), pages 529-546, June.
    18. James Nebus, 2019. "Will tax reforms alone solve the tax avoidance and tax haven problems?," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(3), pages 258-271, September.
    19. Frank Barry, 2019. "Aggressive Tax Planning Practices and Inward-FDI Implications for Ireland of the New US Corporate Tax Regime," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 325-340.
    20. Eric J. Allen & Susan C. Morse, 2013. "Tax-Haven Incorporation for U.S.-Headquartered Firms: No Exodus Yet," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 66(2), pages 395-420, June.
    21. Cen, Ling & Maydew, Edward L. & Zhang, Liandong & Zuo, Luo, 2017. "Customer–supplier relationships and corporate tax avoidance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 377-394.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:0926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dongxian Guo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbsoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.