Author
Listed:
- Bob Wen
(Clemson University)
Abstract
Using individual-level panel data from PSID, we consistently estimate the causal effects of own wages on interior labour supply for married women who were between 17 and 55 years old in 2005 and surveyed every two years till 2015. We first discuss the representative married woman's utility maximisation choice subject to her budget constraint that connects her husband's wages and non-labour income to her labour supply decisions through the couple relationship. Suggested by the optimal hours of work equation and comparative statics, we start our empirical analysis with a pooled OLS, holding relevant factors constant. Then we take into account the endogeneity problem due to sample selection and alleviate this issue by adding the selection variable (the inverse Mill's ratio from probit selection regression) into the hours of work equation. Besides, we control for individual heterogeneity (such as the married women's preference for work, ability and family tradition) and simultaneity of labour supply and labour demand using panel data fixed effects 2SLS with demand shifters as instruments for endogenous variables in the labour supply equation. We find that: (1) The causal effects of wages on labour supply (the hours-wage elasticities) drop from 0.29 in the pooled OLS to 0.16 in the panel data fixed effects 2SLS model after we account for sample selection, individual heterogeneity, and simultaneous equations bias. (2) Holding other factors constant, a 1% increase in married women's wages raises their hours of work by 0.16% on average. (3) Part-time female workers are more responsive to wage changes than their full-time counterparts. (4) There is evidence of backwards-bending labour supply curves.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:scon19:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.