IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/neur24/02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The SCCS design

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Henrik Bruun

    (Aalborg University Hospital)

Abstract

The SCCS design, in contrast to standard epidemiological observational designs like the cohort and case– control design, offers a more time- and cost-efficient approach. This efficiency is due to the larger sample sizes required by the standard designs. Further, the SCCS method automatically adjusts for known and unknown fixed confounders. The latter can be a significant challenge in standard designs. The SCCS method splits an observation period into one or more risk periods and one or more control periods. The risk periods are relative to an exposure event, whereas the observation period is either fixed or relative to the exposure event. Often, one adds time or age adjustments during the observation period. The basic idea is to compare incidence rates for the risk periods with the control period while adjusting for time or age and cases. The SCCS design originates from the desire to estimate the relative effect of vaccines, such as the MMR, on adverse events like meningitis. Compared with the classical design, it is a matter of asking when instead of who. I will discuss the SCCS design and present the Stata command sccsdta, which transforms datasets of times for events and exposures by cases into datasets marked into risk and control periods as well as time or age periods. After the dataset transformation, the analysis is simple, using fixed-effect Poisson regression.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Henrik Bruun, "undated". "The SCCS design," Northern European Stata Conference 2024 02, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:neur24:02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/neur2024/Northern_Europe24_Bruun.pdf
    File Function: presentation materials
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farrington, C. Paddy & Anaya-Izquierdo, Karim & Whitaker, Heather J. & Hocine, Mounia N. & Douglas, Ian & Smeeth, Liam, 2011. "Self-Controlled Case Series Analysis With Event-Dependent Observation Periods," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 417-426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:neur24:02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.