IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/fsug08/4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Some challenges in survival analysis with large datasets

Author

Listed:
  • Noori Akhtar-Danesh

    (McMaster University)

Abstract

In this presentation some common challenges in survival analysis with large datasets are demonstrated. We investigate the relationship between the age of smoking initiation and some demographic factors in the Canadian Community Health Survey, Cycle 3.1 (CCHS-3.1) dataset. CCHS-3.1 is a large dataset which includes information for over 130000 individuals. We used different techniques for model fitting and model checking. Test-based techniques for the assessment of PH assumption are not very useful as small deviation from the theoretical model leads to the rejection of PH assumption. In contrast graphical approaches seem to be more helpful. However, not every diagnostic graph can be drawn due to large dataset. Preliminary results show that 63% of Canadians ever smoked a whole cigarette. Therefore, it seems more appropriate to use a cure fraction model (Lambert 2007; Stata Journal, 7:(3), pp. 1-25) to handle the large proportion of censored data. However, sampling weights cannot be used in this model. In conclusion, survival analysis for large datasets cannot be done easily. Some challenges include assessment of PH assumption and drawing diagnostic graphs. Besides, use of cure fraction model may not be appropriate if sampling weights cannot be incorporated in the model estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Noori Akhtar-Danesh, 2008. "Some challenges in survival analysis with large datasets," Fall North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2008 4, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:fsug08:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/fnasug2008/Stata2008-Noori-Akhtar-Danesh.ppt
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:fsug08:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.