IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/dsug17/01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why propensity scores should be used for matching

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Jann

    (University of Bern)

Abstract

In their paper titled Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching, Gary King and Richard Nielsen suggest that propensity-score matching (PSM) is inferior to other matching procedures such as Mahalanobis matching (King and Nielsen 2016). They argue that PSM approximates complete randomization, whereas other techniques approximate fully blocked randomization, and that fully blocked randomization dominates complete randomization in terms of statistical efficiency. They illustrate their argument using constructed examples, simulations, and applications to real data. Overall, their results suggest that PSM has dramatic deficiencies and should best be discarded. Although the claim about the superior efficiency of a fully blocked design over complete randomization is true (given a specific sample size), the problems King and Nielsen identify apply only under certain conditions. First, the complete randomization argument is valid only with respect to covariates that are not related to the treatment. Second, and more importantly, King and Nielsen's "PSM paradox" occurs only for specific variants of PSM. I will explain why this is the case, and I will show that other variants of PSM compare favorably with blocking procedures such as Mahalanobis matching. I will illustrate my arguments using a new matching software called "kmatch".

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Jann, 2017. "Why propensity scores should be used for matching," German Stata Users' Group Meetings 2017 01, Stata Users Group.
    • Handle: RePEc:boc:dsug17:01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/dsug2017/Germany17_Jann.pdf
    File Function: presentation materials
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Apeti, Ablam Estel & Combes, Jean-Louis & Minea, Alexandru, 2024. "Inflation targeting and fiscal policy volatility: Evidence from developing countries," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Philipp vom Berge & Achim Schmillen, 2023. "Effects of mass layoffs on local employment—evidence from geo-referenced data," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 509-539.
    3. Philipp vom Berge & Achim Schmillen, 2023. "Effects of mass layoffs on local employment—evidence from geo-referenced data," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 509-539.
    4. Bornmann, Lutz & Tekles, Alexander, 2021. "Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    5. Alda, Erik, 2020. "The effects of body-worn cameras on police efficiency: A study of local police agencies in the US," MPRA Paper 103887, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Farieta, Alejandro & Delprato, Marcos, 2024. "The effect of philosophy on critical reading: Evidence from initial teacher education in Colombia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Gabriele Beccari & Francesco Marchionne & Beniamino Pisicoli, 2022. "Alternative financing and investment in intangibles: evidence from Italian firms," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 174, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    8. Chih‐Hai Yang & Chia‐Hui Huang & Wei‐Hsuan Chang, 2021. "Does Reduction In The Tax Credit Rate Retard R&D Activity? Evidence From Taiwan'S R&D Tax Credit Reform In 2010," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 398-415, April.
    9. Alda, Erik, 2020. "The effects of body-worn cameras on police efficiency: A study of local police agencies in the US," MPRA Paper 103994, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:dsug17:01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.