IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bis/biswps/1227.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Decentralised dealers? examining liquidity provision in decentralised exchanges

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Aquilina
  • Sean Foley
  • Leonardo Gambacorta
  • William Krekel

Abstract

Decentralised exchanges allow participants to buy and sell assets without the need for intermediaries, in theory democratising liquidity provision. However, using data from the largest decentralised exchange, we show that liquidity provision – rather than being the purview of a diffused set of market participants – is instead confined predominantly to a small group o f sophisticated ones. These participants submit orders that mimic bids and asks and are able to extract significantly higher profits (both in absolute and relative terms) compared to their unsophisticated counterparts. They also exhibit considerable skill, extracting higher profits during periods of high volatility by capturing a higher share of trading without incurring additional adverse selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Aquilina & Sean Foley & Leonardo Gambacorta & William Krekel, "undated". "Decentralised dealers? examining liquidity provision in decentralised exchanges," BIS Working Papers 1227, Bank for International Settlements.
    • Handle: RePEc:bis:biswps:1227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/work1227.pdf
    File Function: Full PDF document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/work1227.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin William Cong & Ke Tang & Yanxin Wang & Xi Zhao, 2023. "Inclusion and Democratization Through Web3 and DeFi? Initial Evidence from the Ethereum Ecosystem," NBER Working Papers 30949, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Jiahua Xu & Krzysztof Paruch & Simon Cousaert & Yebo Feng, 2021. "SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols," Papers 2103.12732, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    3. Marco Pagano, 1989. "Endogenous Market Thinness and Stock Price Volatility," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 56(2), pages 269-287.
    4. Stefan Loesch & Nate Hindman & Mark B Richardson & Nicholas Welch, 2021. "Impermanent Loss in Uniswap v3," Papers 2111.09192, arXiv.org.
    5. Cornelli, Giulio & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Garratt, Rodney & Reghezza, Alessio, 2024. "Why DeFi lending? Evidence from Aave V2," CEPR Discussion Papers 19358, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Harold Demsetz, 1968. "The Cost of Transacting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 82(1), pages 33-53.
    7. Foley, Sean & Krekel, William & Mollica, Vito & Svec, Jiri, 2023. "Not so fast: Identifying and remediating slow and imprecise cryptocurrency exchange data," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    8. Brogaard, Jonathan & Carrion, Allen & Moyaert, Thibaut & Riordan, Ryan & Shkilko, Andriy & Sokolov, Konstantin, 2018. "High frequency trading and extreme price movements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 253-265.
    9. Eric Budish & Peter Cramton & John Shim, 2015. "Editor's Choice The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race: Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1547-1621.
    10. Foley, Sean & Putniņš, Tālis J., 2016. "Should we be afraid of the dark? Dark trading and market quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 456-481.
    11. Agostino Capponi & Ruizhe Jia, 2021. "The Adoption of Blockchain-based Decentralized Exchanges," Papers 2103.08842, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aquilina, Matteo & Foley, Sean & O'Neill, Peter & Ruf, Thomas, 2024. "Sharks in the dark: Quantifying HFT dark pool latency arbitrage," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Bellia, Mario & Christensen, Kim & Kolokolov, Aleksey & Pelizzon, Loriana & Renò, Roberto, 2022. "Do designated market makers provide liquidity during a flash crash?," SAFE Working Paper Series 270, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2022.
    3. Jing Nie & Juliana Malagon & Julian Williams, 2022. "The impact of high speed quoting on execution risk dynamics: Evidence from interest rate futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 1434-1465, August.
    4. Jakree Koosakul & Ilhyock Shim, 2017. "The beneficial aspect of FX volatility for market liquidity," BIS Working Papers 629, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Raphael Auer & Bernhard Haslhofer & Stefan Kitzler & Pietro Saggese & Friedhelm Victor, 2024. "The technology of decentralized finance (DeFi)," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 55-95, March.
    6. Hagströmer, Björn, 2021. "Bias in the effective bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 314-337.
    7. Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2022. "Axioms for Automated Market Makers: A Mathematical Framework in FinTech and Decentralized Finance," Papers 2210.01227, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    8. Ramos, Sofia B. & von Thadden, Ernst-Ludwig, 2008. "Stock exchange competition in a simple model of capital market equilibrium," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 284-307, August.
    9. Gerig, Austin & Michayluk, David, 2017. "Automated liquidity provision," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-13.
    10. Breedon, Francis & Chen, Louisa & Ranaldo, Angelo & Vause, Nicholas, 2023. "Judgment day: Algorithmic trading around the Swiss franc cap removal," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Gonçalves, Jorge & Kräussl, Roman & Levin, Vladimir, 2019. "Do "speed bumps" prevent accidents in financial markets?," CFS Working Paper Series 636, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    12. Alex Frino & Ognjen Kovacevic & Vito Mollica & Robert I. Webb, 2022. "Connectivity costs and price efficiency: An event study," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 296-309, February.
    13. Yang, Haijun & Ge, Hengshun & Luo, Ying, 2020. "The optimal bid-ask price strategies of high-frequency trading and the effect on market liquidity," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    14. Philippe Bergault & Louis Bertucci & David Bouba & Olivier Gu'eant, 2022. "Automated Market Makers: Mean-Variance Analysis of LPs Payoffs and Design of Pricing Functions," Papers 2212.00336, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    15. Vayanos, Dimitri & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Market Liquidity—Theory and Empirical Evidence ," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1289-1361, Elsevier.
    16. Marcin Wk{a}torek & Marcin Kr'olczyk & Jaros{l}aw Kwapie'n & Tomasz Stanisz & Stanis{l}aw Dro.zd.z, 2024. "Approaching multifractal complexity in decentralized cryptocurrency trading," Papers 2411.05951, arXiv.org.
    17. Benjamin Clapham & Martin Haferkorn & Kai Zimmermann, 2023. "The Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Modern Securities Markets," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(1), pages 7-24, February.
    18. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Brunetti, Celso, 2020. "High frequency traders and the price process," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 20-45.
    19. Aliyev, Nihad & Huseynov, Fariz & Rzayev, Khaladdin, 2022. "Algorithmic trading and investment-to-price sensitivity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118844, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Daniel Chen & Darrell Duffie, 2021. "Market Fragmentation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(7), pages 2247-2274, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    market design; market making; liquidity; automated market maker; decentralised finance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:biswps:1227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Fessler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.