IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bep/cornel/cornell_clsops-1014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Through Culture and its Disciplines: Human Rights and the Institutionalization of Law in China

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Erie

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

The issue of human rights is always grist for the mill of diplomacy. The international community has over the years identified China as a source of chronic and egregious human rights abuses. China's divergence from internationally-recognized norms of human rights constitutes the most serious impediment to China's political, economic, and social integration with the rest of the world.The present paper argues that a sustainable and viable rule of law must precede commitment to and preservation of human rights. The problem immediately becomes one of definitions: whose "rule of law"? whose "human rights"? The meanings of these highly-charged phrases are contested along different lines; much of the discrepancy is caused by the different historical and cultural experiences of peoples in regards to "rule of law" and "human rights." This paper argues that the analytic lens of anthropology can reconceptualize these issues allowing us to think anew about such stumbling blocks to international relations as the universalism/relativism impasse of the human rights debate, the legitimacy and accuracy of "Asian values," and the difficulties China has faced in institutionalizing a rule of law recognized by the international community.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Erie, "undated". "Through Culture and its Disciplines: Human Rights and the Institutionalization of Law in China," Cornell Law School Working Papers cornell_clsops-1014, Cornell Law School.
  • Handle: RePEc:bep:cornel:cornell_clsops-1014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=cornell/clsops
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    China;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bep:cornel:cornell_clsops-1014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.