IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bep/conpil/uconn_cpilj-1005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reauthorizing Discipline for the Disabled Student: Will Congress create a better balance in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)?

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren Zykorie

    (None)

Abstract

In the past, the disabled student faced educational challenges. In 1970, before the enactment of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, only one in five students with disabilities received an education from American public schools. Despite the lack of cost-effectiveness in "consigning disabled children to 'terminal' care in an institution," stereotypes regarding disabled schoolchildren persistently prevented educating disabled students in public schools. Thus, in enacting the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (EHA), later renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Congress mandated an end to the long history of segregation, discrimination, and exclusion of children with disabilities in education. In advocating for the passage of the IDEA, Senator Hubert H. Humphrey (D-MN) argued "too often we keep children whom we regard as 'different' or a 'disturbing influence' out of our schools." Indeed, "special education and disabled children were often considered uneducable, disruptive, and their presence disturbing to children and adults in the school community." Congress intended the IDEA to be the vehicle for challenging these justifications for excluding students with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren Zykorie, "undated". "Reauthorizing Discipline for the Disabled Student: Will Congress create a better balance in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)?," Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal uconn_cpilj-1005, University of Connecticut School of Law.
  • Handle: RePEc:bep:conpil:uconn_cpilj-1005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=uconn/cpilj
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disabilities; Education;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bep:conpil:uconn_cpilj-1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.law.uconn.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.