IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdr/temest/033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sistema de comisiones de las Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar Martínez A.
  • Andrés Murcia Pabón

Abstract

El actual sistema de comisiones en Colombia no genera los incentivos necesarios para que las Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones (AFP) incrementen la rentabilidad de los fondos de pensiones. Dado que la mesada pensional futura de los afiliados depende principalmente de la capitalización de los aportes, es necesario generar un esquema en el cual las AFP estén incentivadas a incrementar los rendimientos de los fondos. Por medio de un modelo en que se calcula el saldo de capital de un afiliado, en este documento se muestran las ventajas de un esquema de comisiones por rendimientos, y cómo este esquema puede ser combinado con un esquema de comisiones sobre aportes como el actual. Finalmente se señalan algunos aspectos a tener en cuenta a la hora de implementar un esquema en esta dirección.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar Martínez A. & Andrés Murcia Pabón, 2008. "Sistema de comisiones de las Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones en Colombia," Temas de Estabilidad Financiera 033, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdr:temest:033
    DOI: 10.32468/tef.33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32468/tef.33
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32468/tef.33?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oscar Martínez A. & Andrés Murcia Pabón, 2007. "Desempeño financiero de los fondos de pensiones obligatorias en Colombia," Temas de Estabilidad Financiera 022, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    2. Rubén Castro, 2005. "Efectos de Largo Plazo de la Comisión Fija en el Sistema Chileno de AFP," Working Papers 9, Superintendencia de Pensiones, revised Aug 2005.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mauricio Arias & Juan Carlos Mendoza, 2009. "Un modelo de simulación del Régimen Pensional de Ahorro Individual con Solidaridad en Colombia," Temas de Estabilidad Financiera 044, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    2. Luis Berggrun Preciado & Fernando Jaramillo Recio, 2010. "Performance Evaluation, Fund Selection And Portfolio Allocation Applied To Colombia´S Pension Funds," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Reveiz & Carlos León & Juan Mario Laserna & Ivonne Martínez, 2008. "Recomendaciones para la modificación del régimen de pensiones obligatorias de Colombia," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, vol. 26(56), pages 78-113, June.
    2. Musalem, Alberto R. & Pasquini, Ricardo, 2012. "Private pension systems : cross-country investment performance," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 68937, The World Bank.
    3. Sam Flanders & Melati Nungsari & Marcela Parada‐Contzen, 2020. "Pricing schemes and market efficiency in private retirement systems," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(4), pages 1041-1068, August.
    4. Andrés Mauricio Gómez Sánchez & José Gabriel Astaiza Gómez, 2015. "Ex-post Equity Risk Premiums and Economic Cycles in Colombia: An Empirical Research Using Kalman and Hodrick-Prescott Filters," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 7(1), pages 109-129, January.
    5. Hidalgo, Pedro & Manzur, Enrique & Olavarrieta, Sergio & Fari­as, Pablo, 2008. "Customer retention and price matching: The AFPs case," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 691-696, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdr:temest:033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Clorith Angélica Bahos-Olivera (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/brcgvco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.