IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_872_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Portraits on banknotes: a study of the gender gap

Author

Listed:
  • Angelamaria Fiori

    (Bank of Italy)

Abstract

Notwithstanding the growing tendency to move beyond a celebratory perspective and to depict non-human subjects, portraiture remains highly popular in banknote design. Historically, however, these portraits have been exclusively male, and while some female portraits have begun to appear over time, depictions of women remain rare even today. In fact, using a database created specifically for this study, we can see that women, excluding Elizabeth II, are present on only 5.6% of banknotes and on 9% of those featuring portraits. While in recent years some central banks have established gender equality on banknotes a priori, in other cases female portraits have been introduced following participatory public campaigns that have called for greater recognition of women's contributions to society. Given that the iconography of banknotes aims to express the values and identity of the issuing country and to depict subjects to whom citizens can easily relate, it is important that central banks remain attentive to civil society and follow its changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelamaria Fiori, 2024. "Portraits on banknotes: a study of the gender gap," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 872, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_872_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2024-0872/QEF_872_24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    banknotes; banknote design; gender diversity; diversity and inclusion; public consultation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_872_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.