IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bca/bocawp/20-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Classical Decomposition of Markowitz Portfolio Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Demone
  • Olivia Di Matteo
  • Barbara Collignon

Abstract

In this study, we enhance Markowitz portfolio selection with graph theory for the analysis of two portfolios composed of either EU or US assets. Using a threshold-based decomposition of their respective covariance matrices, we perturb the level of risk in each portfolio and build the corresponding sets of graphs. We show that the “superimposition” of all graphs in a set allows for the (re)construction of the efficient frontiers. We also identify a relationship between the Sharpe ratio (SR) of a given portfolio and the topology of the corresponding network of assets. More specifically, we suggest SR = f(topology) ≈ f(ECC/BC), where ECC is the eccentricity and BC is the betweenness centrality averaged over all nodes in the network. At each threshold, the structural analysis of the correlated networks provides unique insights into the relationships between assets, agencies, risks, returns and cash flows. We observe that the best threshold or best graph representation corresponds to the portfolio with the highest Sharpe ratio. We also show that simulated annealing performs better than a gradient-based solver.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Demone & Olivia Di Matteo & Barbara Collignon, 2020. "Classical Decomposition of Markowitz Portfolio Selection," Staff Working Papers 20-21, Bank of Canada.
  • Handle: RePEc:bca:bocawp:20-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/swp2020-21.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Central bank research;

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bca:bocawp:20-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bocgvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.