IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bca/bocadp/23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Procyclicality in Central Counterparty Margin Models: A Conceptual Tool Kit and the Key Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Alper Odabasioglu

Abstract

Central counterparty (CCP) initial margin models are procyclical by nature, and CCPs use anti-procyclicality (APC) tools to mitigate this. However, despite the widespread use of such tools, margin models of CCPs around the world reacted severely to the heightened volatility during the March 2020 market turmoil. This triggered a debate globally on the adequacy of APC tools. We offer potential explanations for why those tools were not sufficient. We highlight that, to effectively mitigate procyclicality, the focus should be on the key parameters for both the margin model and the APC tools. One widely adopted APC tool established by the European Market Infrastructure Regulation is the stress period. We show that, to mitigate procyclicality with this tool, the main focus should not be on the calibration of its stressed margin level, but rather on the weight used to add this to the margin model. Further, the stress period tool can be highly effective, but only when its weight parameter is calibrated adequately high. These insights are essential for regulators to provide effective guidance on margin procyclicality, and for CCPs to appropriately design and calibrate their margin systems and procyclicality frameworks. To further serve these needs, we provide a novel conceptual tool kit for regulators and CCPs. The tool kit allows them to see a margin system’s performance in procyclicality as well as in other competing objectives—such as margin coverage and cost of collateral—all in one place and for any combination of calibrations of the key procyclicality parameters. This feature lets regulators set outcomes-based procyclicality targets achievable by CCP margin models and APC tools. Moreover, it helps regulators design prescriptive procyclicality guidance in line with these desired outcomes-based targets. CCPs can use the tool kit to determine the set of parameter calibrations that satisfy the required procyclicality targets and perform sufficiently well in the other competing objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Alper Odabasioglu, 2023. "Procyclicality in Central Counterparty Margin Models: A Conceptual Tool Kit and the Key Parameters," Discussion Papers 2023-34, Bank of Canada.
  • Handle: RePEc:bca:bocadp:23-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2023/12/staff-discussion-paper-2023-34/
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/sdp2023-34.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Coronavirus disease (COVID-19); Credit risk management; Financial institutions; Financial markets; Financial stability; Financial system regulation and policies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G - Financial Economics
    • G0 - Financial Economics - - General
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bca:bocadp:23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bocgvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.