IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/auk/ecosoc/2020_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

«Perceptions of Inequality and Social Mobility»

Author

Listed:
  • Raymundo Campos Vazquez
  • Alice Krozer
  • Aurora Ramírez Alvarez
  • Rodolfo De la Torre
  • Roberto Velez Grajales

    (Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias)

Abstract

Despite evidence of high inequality and low social mobility throughout the world, there has been only limited demand for change. Using new survey and experimental data, we investigate how perceptions about inequality and social mobility affect preferences for redistribution in Mexico. In addition to the perceived level of inequality typically measured in previous studies, we explore perceptions about who is rich and poor and their share of the population. The shape of perceived inequality that we find provides new insights as to why people tolerate large differences between the rich and the poor. We find that Mexicans generally perceive poverty and inequality not too far from measured levels, but they overestimate the income of the rich and their proportion of the population.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymundo Campos Vazquez & Alice Krozer & Aurora Ramírez Alvarez & Rodolfo De la Torre & Roberto Velez Grajales, 2020. "«Perceptions of Inequality and Social Mobility»," Papers 2020_05, Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias.
    • Handle: RePEc:auk:ecosoc:2020_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ceey.org.mx/perceptions-of-inequality-and-social-mobility/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Summers, Kate & Accominotti, Fabien & Burchardt, Tania & Hecht, Katharina & Mann, Elizabeth & Mijs, Jonathan J.B, 2022. "Deliberating inequality: a blueprint for studying the social formation of beliefs about economic inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114591, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:auk:ecosoc:2020_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEEY Editorial (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceeymmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.