IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/asu/wpaper/2132849.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exchange Rates and FOMC Days

Author

Abstract

FOMC meeting days provide a natural laboratory for exploring the effects of policy uncertainty and learning on exchange rate determination. Intradaily mark/dollar exchange rates are employed for 10 FOMC meetings. The meetings examined are the first 10 following the February 1994 change in policy where the meeting outcome is announced after meetings end. The following hypotheses motivated by the market microstructure literature are examined: 1) strategic behavior by informed traders should result in position-taking prior to meeting end and the revelation of policy and 2) bid-ask spreads should widen due to adverse selection potential as the probability of quoting to an informed trader increases. A markov-switching model is used to estimate the time of informed position-taking. The data suggest that on most days, there is a switch to the informed-trading state during the time of the meeting, well before the end of the meeting. An extensive search of public news indicates that the informed trading cannot be explained as the response to public information. An ordered probit model of the bid-ask spread is estimated as a function of the probability of being in the informed trading state. The estimation results indicate that the greater the probability of being in the informed trading state, the wider spreads. This is consistent with dealers protecting against adverse selection in quoting. The evidence indicates that meeting outcomes are generally anticipated during the meeting. In this sense, the realization of the meeting outcome is often not news.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Melvin, "undated". "Exchange Rates and FOMC Days," Working Papers 2132849, Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:asu:wpaper:2132849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpcarey.asu.edu/tools/mytools/pubs_admin/FILES/draft701.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asu:wpaper:2132849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Steve Salik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deasuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.