IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2024-047.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improvement of the Sales Comparison Approach using Analytical Hierarchy Process and linear optimization: application and validation

Author

Listed:
  • Pietro Bonifaci
  • Federica Libralon
  • Alessandra Saviane
  • Sergio Copiello

Abstract

The sales comparison adjustment grid within the market approach suffers from several flaws and drawbacks, one of the most conspicuous of which lies in the subjectivity - uncertainty, too, and even lack of reliability - affecting the weights of the comparables’ attributes. The literature has already focused on improving the sales comparison adjustment technique, but the approaches proposed so far - though promising - are usually inconvenient and too complex to be included in any appraisal. We propose to overcome the subjectivity issue by complementing the sales comparison adjustment grid with an automated weighting process based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and linear optimization. The solution suggested here aims to be easily replicable by practitioners and appraisers on a worksheet, without requiring expert knowledge of mathematics and statistics.The ranking of the comparables according to their sale price and the ranking of the same according to their attributes are elicited using pairwise comparison matrices, which are built by calculating the ratios of the prices and the ratios of the attributes’ values, respectively. Using ratios leads to pairwise comparison matrices that are, by definition, perfectly consistent. Nevertheless, while using ratios is straightforward for quantitative attributes, it also poses the issue of how the qualitative ones are coded and measured. The ranking of the comparables according to their sale price and according to their attributes are then matched by changing the attributes’ weights. The iterative search for the optimal weights employs the solvers available in common worksheets.Several tests are performed to validate the proposed model. Some of them use ordinary residential building units for sale both as the subject and as comparables. Once the subject is identified, ten or so other properties for sale are chosen in the same urban area as comparables; the comparison is primarily based on the information included in the online real estate advertisements. Other tests are conducted based on the appraisal reports the Italian Revenue Agency prepared for a set of peculiar publicly-owned buildings. As comparables, we use the same properties identified to that end in the appraisal reports mentioned above, and the comparison focuses on and is limited to the attributes considered there. The results suggest that complementing the sales comparison adjustment grid with a weighting system derived from the data itself leads to a fair appraisal of the property market value.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro Bonifaci & Federica Libralon & Alessandra Saviane & Sergio Copiello, 2024. "Improvement of the Sales Comparison Approach using Analytical Hierarchy Process and linear optimization: application and validation," ERES eres2024-047, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2024-047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2024-047
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Analytic Hierarchy Process; Comparable method; Linear optimization; Market approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2024-047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.