IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2018_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Application of Quantitative Risk Analysis in Property Development Projects in Nigeria: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Obinna Collins Nnamani

Abstract

Property development is a multifaceted, dynamic and risky enterprise. Property development projects are fraught with risks and uncertainties spanning through the stages of the development process. Risk and uncertainty, if not well managed, could have harmful impacts on development project by affecting time, quality, and cost of such project. In Nigeria, evidences abound of property development failures and abandonments with the attendant social, environmental and economic consequences. Development projects are abandoned before completion or completed projects are not disposed over six months. In other cases, completed projects are foreclosed by development lenders due to inability of the developers to service their loans. These problems could be attributed to development companies not employing formal strategic risk management in project evaluation. The aim of this paper is to review literature and previous research on application of risk management techniques in property development industry with a view to identify the possibility for further research in Nigeria. The review used various sources such as textbooks, journal articles, reports, masters’ dissertations and doctoral theses relevant to the study. The review showed that, generally, risk management is still largely handled in a subjective manner. Any notion that developers are now applying a wide range of rigourous and sophisticated risk management techniques is erroneous as this is scarcely manifested in actual practice. In the Nigerian context, there is probably no research on risk management by development companies; few risk management studies were limited to risk analysis/assessment; while others focused on building construction risk which is just one of the stages in the property development process. This paper recommends the development of an advanced risk management framework applicable to the Nigerian property development industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Obinna Collins Nnamani, 2018. "Application of Quantitative Risk Analysis in Property Development Projects in Nigeria: A Review," ERES eres2018_8, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2018_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2018-8
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/P_20171129160112_1131.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Corinna Cagliano & Sabrina Grimaldi & Carlo Rafele, 2015. "Choosing project risk management techniques. A theoretical framework," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 232-248, February.
    2. Nerija Banaitiene & Audrius Banaitis, 2012. "Risk Management in Construction Projects," Chapters, in: Nerija Banaitiene (ed.), Risk Management - Current Issues and Challenges, IntechOpen.
    3. Pavlos Loizou & Nick French, 2012. "Risk and uncertainty in development," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 198-210, March.
    4. Zhen Chen & Sukulpat Khumpaisal, 2009. "An analytic network process for risks assessment in commercial real estate development," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(3), pages 238-258, April.
    5. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    6. Sascha Marcel Donner, 2010. "Risk management in the aftermath of Lehmann Brothers -- Results from a survey among German and international real estate investors," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 19-38, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galina Shevchenko & Leonas Ustinovichius & Dariusz Walasek, 2019. "The Evaluation of the Contractor’s Risk in Implementing the Investment Projects in Construction by Using the Verbal Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Serpell Alfredo Federico & Ferrada Ximena & Rubio Larissa, 2019. "Measuring the performance of project risk management: a preliminary model," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1984-1991, January.
    3. Wen-Shiung Lee, 2013. "Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(15-16), pages 1473-1494, December.
    4. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    5. Dengsheng Wu & Xiaoqian Zhu & Jie Wan & Chunbing Bao & Jianping Li, 2019. "A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting Risk Response Strategies of Software Project: From the Perspective of Risk Correlations," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 339-364, January.
    6. Peter Ö. hman & Bo Söderberg & Stig Westerdahl, 2012. "Property investor behaviour: qualitative analysis of a very large transaction," ERES eres2012_376, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    7. Marcel Ioan BOLOS & Diana Claudia SABĂU-POPA & Emil SCARLAT & Ioana-Alexandra BRADEA & Camelia DELCEA,, 2016. "A Business Intelligence Instrument for Detection and Mitigation of Risks Related to Projects Financed from Structural Funds," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(2), pages 165-178.
    8. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    10. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    11. Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Dominique Vasseur & Francois Beaudouin, 2020. "A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 748-763, December.
    12. Heiner Ackermann & Erik Diessel & Michael Helmling & Neil Jami & Johanna Münch, 2024. "Computing Optimal Mitigation Plans for Force-Majeure Scenarios in Dynamic Manufacturing Chains," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    13. Wen Shiung Lee & Ya Ting Yang, 2013. "Valuation and choice of convertible bonds based on MCDM," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 861-868, May.
    14. Aigner, Philipp & Schlütter, Sebastian, 2023. "Enhancing gradient capital allocation with orthogonal convexity scenarios," ICIR Working Paper Series 47/23, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    15. Mangirdas Morkunas & Gintaras Cernius & Gintare Giriuniene, 2019. "Assessing Business Risks of Natural Gas Trading Companies: Evidence from GET Baltic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    17. Hadi Sarvari & Alireza Valipour & Nordin Yahya & Norhazilan MD Noor & Michael Beer & Nerija Banaitiene, 2019. "Approaches to Risk Identification in Public–Private Partnership Projects: Malaysian Private Partners’ Overview," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Claudius A. Peleskei & Vasile Dorca & Radu A. Munteanu & Radu Munteanu, 2015. "Risk Consideration and Cost Estimation in Construction Projects Using Monte Carlo Simulation," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 10(2), pages 163-176.
    19. Dr Jason Mwanza & Nothando Tshuma, 2023. "Mitigating Business Risk in Manufacturing SMEs: A nexus between informal and formal business risk management: A case of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(1), pages 1107-1138, January.
    20. Li, Weijun & Sun, Qiqi & Zhang, Jiwang & Zhang, Laibin, 2024. "Quantitative risk assessment of industrial hot work using Adaptive Bow Tie and Petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    21. Ekaterine Gulua & Natalia Kharadze, 2022. "Employed Students' Development Challenges in Georgia," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, ejis_v8_i.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Property Development; Review; Risk; Risk Management; Uncertainty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2018_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.