IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2016_141.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who cares about Walk Scores? A quantile approach to residential house prices and walkability

Author

Listed:
  • Andy Carswell
  • Velma Zahirovic-Herbert
  • Karen Gibler

Abstract

The housing market has become more diversified in recent years to reflect changing housing preferences. Although home buyers’ preference toward single-family detached homes, the least compact form of housing, still remains strong, the demand and support for compact and walkable communities have been increasing during the past few decades. This paper empirically examines the distribution of demand for walkability using quantile regression analysis of housing market data in King County, WA. Recent literature has emerged that looks at the housing market and uses house prices to infer the value residents place on neighborhood characteristics including walkability. In hedonic methods house prices are estimated as a function of measures reflecting the quality of the neighborhood that the house in question is located in, along with numerous other characteristics describing house attributes such as the number of rooms, bathroom, size and others. A majority of empirical studies on this topic examines the average behavior. The average effects as estimated by OLS conceal considerable heterogeneity in demand for walkability due to the “aggregation” of families’ differential willingness to pay. In this paper we use quantile regression to estimate the extent to which differences in walkability, as measured by Walk Score, can explain the variability in property values at different points in the distribution of house price.

Suggested Citation

  • Andy Carswell & Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen Gibler, 2016. "Who cares about Walk Scores? A quantile approach to residential house prices and walkability," ERES eres2016_141, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-141
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Telega & Ivan Telega & Agnieszka Bieda, 2021. "Measuring Walkability with GIS—Methods Overview and New Approach Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. John Landis & Vincent J. Reina, 2021. "Do Restrictive Land Use Regulations Make Housing More Expensive Everywhere?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(4), pages 305-324, November.
    3. Jingyuan Zhang & Puay Yok Tan & Hui Zeng & Ye Zhang, 2019. "Walkability Assessment in a Rapidly Urbanizing City and Its Relationship with Residential Estate Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.