IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2015_102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to align the organization of the CREM-department to strategy during a recession

Author

Listed:
  • Thijs Ploumen
  • Rianne Appel Meulenbroek
  • Jos Smeets

Abstract

Purpose - In times of recession a lot of companies need to reduce costs. This also affects the budgets that are available for corporate real estate (CRE). Therefore it is important that the organization of the CRE management (CREM)-department is optimally aligned with CRE-strategy. This study provides a tool for evaluating the organization of the CREM-department when applying the CRE-strategy of cost reduction.Design/methodology/approach - The evaluation tool for alignment of the organization of the CREM-department is a result of an explorative study. First a literature study was conducted which led to a theoretical model of factors that influence the organization of the CREM-department, with regard to five components: Organizational structure, Sourcing, Centralization, Process management and Company culture. Then empirical data was collected through interviews with two groups of respondents, namely CREM-departments who served as cases and CRE-consultants to hear their expert opinions. Cross-case analysis and a comparison of these results with the expert opinion of the consultants were used to look for links between the CREM department components and each CRE strategy.Findings - It was not possible to formulate links between every possible CRE strategy and the CREM-organization as most of the cases had implemented the same strategy, namely cost reduction. This did provide the opportunity to construct a clear evaluation model for this particular strategy. Not all the themes were aligned with the chosen CRE-strategy identically by all the CREM-departments with a cost reduction strategy, but many similarities came forward and were backed by the CREM experts. This was worked into an evaluation model on the alignment of the organization of the CREM-department with a cost reduction strategy.Research limitations/implications - The model developed is especially relevant for CREM-departments who have similar characteristics as the CREM-departments who served as cases: large companies with a division macro-organizational structure that apply the CRE-strategy of cost reduction. The evaluation model does not spell out exactly how the CREM organization should be managed and formed, but does provide insight in a number of main choices that can influence the organization of CREM. The purpose of the evaluation model is that the CREM department becomes aware of the consequences for the organization of CREM when implementing a cost reduction aimed CRE-strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Thijs Ploumen & Rianne Appel Meulenbroek & Jos Smeets, 2015. "How to align the organization of the CREM-department to strategy during a recession," ERES eres2015_102, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2015_102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2015-102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/eres2015_102.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek & Barry Haynes, 2014. "An overview of steps and tools for the Corporate Real Estate strategy alignment process," ERES eres2014_57, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Hartmann, Steffen & Linnemann, Peter & Pfnür, Andreas & Moy, Deborah & Siperstein, Boris, 2010. "Responsibility for and Performance of Corporate Real Estate Functions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 42251, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Hugh O. Nourse & Stephen E. Roulac & Stellan Lundstrom, 1993. "Linking Real Estate Decisions to Corporate Strategy," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 8(4), pages 475-494.
    4. Peter R. Veale, 1989. "Managing Corporate Real Estate Assets: Current Executive Attitudes and Prospects for an Emergent Management Discipline," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 4(3), pages 1-22.
    5. Barry P. Haynes, 2012. "Adding value through corporate real estate asset management alignment," ERES eres2012_056, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    6. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2014-57 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2011-194 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Donald R. Epley, 2004. "New Ranking of Decision-Making Subject Areas for Corporate Real Estate Executives," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 26(1), pages 43-68.
    9. Christopher Heywood, 2011. "Approaches to Aligning Corporate Real Estate and Organisational StrategyORGANISATIONAL STRATEGY," ERES eres2011_194, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    10. Anna-Liisa Lindholm & Karen M. Gibler & Kari I. Levainen, 2006. "Modelling the Value Adding Attributes of Real Estate to the Wealth Maximization of the Firm," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 28(4), pages 445-476.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek & Barry Haynes, 2014. "An overview of steps and tools for the Corporate Real Estate strategy alignment process," ERES eres2014_57, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Christopher Heywood & Monique Arkesteijn, 2017. "Meta-Corporate Real Estate Management: Some preliminary thoughts," ERES eres2017_180, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    3. Fernanda Antunes Batista da Silva, 2021. "Flexible workspaces within corporate real estate," LARES lares-2021-4dqc, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    4. Chris Manning & Stephen E. Roulac, 1999. "Corporate Real Estate Research within the Academy," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 17(3), pages 265-280.
    5. Farahiyah Fadzil & Hishamuddin Mohd Ali & Ahmad Ariffian Bujang, 2011. "Corporate Real Estate Function: A Review," ERES eres2011_207, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    6. Julan Du & Charles Ka Yui Leung & Derek Chu, 2014. "Return Enhancing, Cash-rich or simply Empire-Building? An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Real Estate Holdings," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 17(3), pages 301-357.
    7. Christopher Heywood, 2011. "Approaches to Aligning Corporate Real Estate and Organisational StrategyORGANISATIONAL STRATEGY," ERES eres2011_194, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    8. Stephen E. Roulac, 2001. "Corporate Property Strategy is Integral to Corporate Business Strategy," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 22(1/2), pages 129-152.
    9. Ronald Beckers & Theo van der Voordt, 2014. "Corporate Real Estate Alignment Strategies in Dutch Higher Education," ERES eres2014_23, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    10. Chris Manning & Stephen E. Roulac, 2001. "Lessons from the Past and Future Directions for Corporate Real Estate Research," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 22(1/2), pages 7-58.
    11. Kłosowski Sławomir, 2018. "The Concept of the Process Approach in Corporate Real Estate Management," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 26(4), pages 5-11, December.
    12. Eetu Ristaniemi & Anna-Liisa Lindholm, 2011. "Added Value of Corporate Real Estate Management in Industrial Premises," ERES eres2011_134, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    13. Barry P. Haynes, 2012. "Adding value through corporate real estate asset management alignment," ERES eres2012_056, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    14. Singer, Bas P. & Bossink, Bart A.G. & Van de Putte, J.M., 2007. "Corporate Real Estate and Competitive Strategy," Serie Research Memoranda 0005, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    15. Anna-Liisa Lindholm & Karen M. Gibler & Kari I. Levainen, 2006. "Modelling the Value Adding Attributes of Real Estate to the Wealth Maximization of the Firm," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 28(4), pages 445-476.
    16. Zifeng Feng & William G. Hardin & Zhonghua Wu, 2022. "Employee productivity and REIT performance," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(1), pages 59-88, March.
    17. Michael J. Seiler & Arjun Chatrath & James R. Webb, 2001. "Real Asset Ownership and the Risk and Return to Stockholders," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 22(1/2), pages 199-212.
    18. Marco Locurcio & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Tajani & Felicia Di Liddo, 2020. "An Innovative GIS-Based Territorial Information Tool for the Evaluation of Corporate Properties: An Application to the Italian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    19. Nurul Sahida Fauzi & Ashrof Zainuddin & Abdul Hadi Nawawi & Noraini Johari, 2018. "A Pilot Framework of Corporate Real Estate Sustainable Performance Measurement (CRESPM)," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 725-739, February.
    20. Dirk Brounen & Piet Eichholtz, 2005. "Corporate Real Estate Ownership Implications: International Performance Evidence," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 429-445, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2015_102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.