Author
Listed:
- Tanya Rountree
- Ian Elsmore
Abstract
The relationship between buildings and the people that inhabit and utilise them is complex and multifaceted. This complexity is dependent on a number of interconnected factors such as; the nature of the building, the building’s status and its use, all of which affect the perception of the building and its contribution to the local environment. The purpose of this paper is to consider what happens when a particular set of these factors combine. Hospitality and the built environment are interdependent upon one another and have been so ever since the inception of civilisation (O’Gorman 2010). The commercialisation of hospitality has been accompanied over the centuries by a combination of the development of specific buildings and the adaptation of existing buildings for hospitality purposes. This has led to the adaptation, revitalisation and rejuvenation of post-industrial buildings for commercial hospitality purposes as a key means to achieve the continued and sustainable us of the historic built environment (Mc Neill, 2008, Bell, 2005). This creation of hospitality outlets in character buildings can be seen as a ‘lightest touch’ option allowing the implementation of conservation and planning legislation, an option that also provides the possibility of income generation and employment creation with continued public access and therefore fulfils their obligation not only to preserve such buildings but also to achieve sustainable development (PCPAct, 2004). While adaption can result in operational and financial challenges (Ransley and Ingram, 2004) these can be countered by opportunities for brand management. Current UK Government advice is that developers and policy makers should see the historic built environment as an asset, with economically viable reuse being encouraged as a means of achieving sustainable development (DCLG 2012). But in order to achieve successful adaptation an understanding of the relationship between buildings, people, operations and legislation is necessary. The alternative ontological perspective offered by Actor-Network Theory (Law, 1999, Latour, 2005), bridges the traditional social-physical divide and provides a tool for allowing the relationship between hospitality and the built environment to be understood.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2013_339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.