Author
Listed:
- Andreas Pfnür
- Kevin Meyer
Abstract
The influence of immovable resources on the achievement of corporate goals, is increasingly recognized by corporates. As a result, improving the efficiency of real estate management is becoming more and more important. Due to the major leverage regarding costs and benefits, in particular the procurement of new real estate is very important. For this purpose are two variants available. Firstly the corporates are solely responsible for the investment or secondly buy the investment performance on the market via an investor model. In addition to these two variants, the PPP concept has been succesfully established in recent years. However, this partnership model has not been transferred to the procurement of corporate real estate till yet. This paper analyzes on the one hand the structural and procedural characteristics of the three procurement variants. On the other hand, are those criteria presented which are relevant from the perspective of the corporates to increase efficiency in the procurement of real estate. In the empirical part of the paper are three case studies of the procurement variants in terms of meeting the efficiency criteria compared. This comparison is based on data which were generated in the scientific monitoring of a pilot project. In this pilot project the PPP concept is transferred to private real estate users for the first time. The determination of the efficiency differences is carried out by using the TOPSIS technique. This technique makes it possible to measure the relative efficiency of the different variants among themselves, without having a fixed standard of comparison. To increase the efficiency of the transmission the PPP concept to corporate real estate, concrete recommendations are developed from the findings of the efficiency analysis.
Suggested Citation
Andreas Pfnür & Kevin Meyer, 2012.
"Efficiency effect of partnership models in the procurement of corporate real estate,"
ERES
eres2012_169, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Handle:
RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_169
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.