Author
Listed:
- Hilde Remøy
- Jurrien De Koning
Abstract
Studies of several office markets indicate the importance of building and location attributes in relation to office user preferences. It is common practice to use hedonic pricing models to describe the relationship between rental levels and building and location attributes. However, office buildings that have been vacant for a long period of time in a market with few transactions are hard to assess, and another approach to value these buildings is needed: instead of considering the buildingís current use, the future possibilities and use value of the buildings should be considered. This study examines the opportunities for investors and owners of vacant office space in a market where few transactions took place, aiming to reveal whether adaptation of obsolete office buildings can contribute to an increased future value of these buildings. Additionally, this paper examines whether this approach can contribute to an improved local office market. Subsequently, this paper answers the following questions: Which opportunities do owners and investors have for dealing with obsolete office buildings? What influence will their actions have on the (local) office market? The office market studied in this paper is Amsterdam with a focus on the submarket Amsterdam South east which holds a substantial part of the Amsterdam office stock (1 million square metres, 15% of the Amsterdam office stock). The vacancy level of this submarket is near 30% and among the highest in Europe. The data used to answer the questions above were delivered by the research department of Cushman & Wakefield Amsterdam. The building and location characteristics of 104 office buildings were studied, which amounts to two third of the offices in Amsterdam Southeast.
Suggested Citation
Hilde Remøy & Jurrien De Koning, 2012.
"Future value of obsolete offices,"
ERES
eres2012_111, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Handle:
RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_111
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.