Author
Listed:
- Lucia Gibilaro
- Claudio Giannotti
- Gianluca Mattarocci
Abstract
Liquidity is the ability of a bank to collect money necessary for financing assets and meet obligations as they come due, without incurring unsustainable losses; the maturity transformation of short-term deposits into long-term loans makes banks inherently vulnerable to liquidity risk (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2008). As banks specialized on real estate finance show an average high duration of the assets (Booth, 2002), liquidity risk is extremely relevant to ensure the stability of the financial intermediary. Under an asset and liabilities management approach (ALM), the paper is aimed to analyze the impact of the maturities structure on the liquidity position, discriminating between residential property specialized lenders and others. Yearly and half-yearly balance sheet data are collected from the ABI Banking Data database over the period 2000-2008. Data attain the individual balance sheet and all consolidated balance sheets are excluded from the analysis. In order to construct a sample that is representative of the Italian market, all banks available in each semester are selected independently from number of semesters for which the data are available The asset / liability structure analysis considers the banking book of each bank and computes, for each semester, measures of the liquidity risk exposure as: contractual maturity mismatch (Drago, 2003); concentration on funding (Matz and Neu, 2007); available unencumbered assets (Resti and Sironi, 2007). The sample is classified on the basis of the percentage of residential loan exposures on the total assets using a threshold the 40% per cent (Eisenbeis and Kwast, 1991). Total active banks are stratified in three groups according to the number of years in which they could be classified as specialized real estate banks (Blasko and Sinkey, 2006). A comparison of ALM measures for different subsamples is released in order to evaluate if the choice to specialize in the real estate sector affect the exposure at risk of the bank Results obtained will show that misalignment between asset and liability structure affects the liquidity position of the bank. The borrowerís business sector and characteristics affect the bankís liquidity risk exposure. Banks that are structurally more exposed are those that are specialized in the real estate sectors. Empirical evidence provided demonstrates that the current debate on the need to define asset/liability maturity regulatory constraints could have relevant implication for the Italian banking sector, especially for the banks involved in the property market.
Suggested Citation
Lucia Gibilaro & Claudio Giannotti & Gianluca Mattarocci, 2010.
"Liquidity Risk Exposure For Specialized And Unspecialized Real Estate Banks: Evidences From The Italian Market,"
ERES
eres2010_240, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Handle:
RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_240
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Mohammad, Sabri & Asutay, Mehmet & Dixon, Rob & Platonova, Elena, 2020.
"Liquidity risk exposure and its determinants in the banking sector: A comparative analysis between Islamic, conventional and hybrid banks,"
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
- Khemais Zaghdoudi & Abdelaziz Hakimi, 2017.
"The Determinants of Liquidity Risk: Evidence from Tunisian Banks,"
Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 1-5.
- Lucia Gibilaro & Gianluca Mattarocci, 2016.
"Are Real Estate Banks More Affected by Real Estate Market Dynamics?,"
International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 151-170.
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.