Author
Abstract
Recently, effort was undertaken to define criteria for sustainable property investment (L¸tzkendorf and Lorenz, 2007; Moffat and Kohler, 2008; Pivo, 2008). One form of sustainable property investment are sustainable real estate funds, which are now at the stage of market introduction. The problem is that many sustainability rating systems for real estate funds still do not adequately integrate social sustainability. Also the market acceptance of sustainable real estate funds is largely unknown. The building stock is not only a prerequisite for the immediate satisfaction of basichuman needs. It is also a framework condition for higher-order needs, including developing the capabilities of residents or realizing social justice and sustainable lifestyles (cf. Barr and Gilg, 2006; Georg, 1998; Rawls, 1999; Sen, 2001). We performed a two-step study with institutional real estate investors and real estate fund suppliers in the German-speaking parts of Switzerland. Focus groups (N = 15), along with an e-mail-based questionnaire study (N = 68), were used to define and assess sustainability criteria for real estate funds in respect to their importance for market success. We also investigated the key financial stakeholdersë market acceptance of sustainable real estate funds. About three quarter of the responding institutional investors are willing to invest in sustainable real estate funds. Criteria for sustainable social infrastructure must inform ecological and economic assessments of real estate funds in order to avoid risks for ecology, socialmilieu, and return.There is a need for sustainable urban development that meets the demands of sustainable real estate funds (cf. Scholz et al., 1996, 1997). Besides ecological impacts, sustainable real estate investments have to consider the cultural sphere of human-environment systems (cf. Scholz, in prep.; Scholz and Binder, 2004). As a consequence, there is a need for sustainability learning of key stakeholder groups (cf. Hansmann et al., 2003). These results may inform the design, assessment and marketing of sustainable real estate funds.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.