Author
Abstract
Hedonic office rent prediction models which are the most common method based on multiple regression are well established in the literature. A wide range of variables, categorised as econometric, architectural, spatial and tenure rights, are used in these models for various cities. In the light of previous studies, some difficulties can arise in gathering data and applying the hedonic theory. As the dependent variable, asking rent is preferred in some models while contract rent or effective rent are used in others. It is reported that the use of contract or effective rent instead of asking rent, can provide more accurate predictions. However, it is difficult to obtain sufficient contract data from real estate firms, due to confidentiality and competition. The major difficulty lies within the hedonic regression models is the multicollinearity problem that may exist between a large number of independent variables. The common solution may reduce number of variables by exclude some variables depending on significance level or using ìstepwiseî or ìbackwardî procedure in regression models. In this study, it is attempted to construct a rent prediction model for _stanbul office market. The rent prediction model is improved in two ways. First, some variables are eliminated by ìbackwardî procedure in standard regression model and a reduced model is constructed. Second, factor analysis is conducted to group related variables and then, factors are incorporated into the regression model. Besides, three different rental values; asking rent, gross and net contract rent are used as dependent variable in the prediction models. Finally, performance of prediction models are compared according to R-squared and t-statistics. Akaike Information Criteria and Schwarz Information Criteria are also employed to test the accuracy of proposed models.
Suggested Citation
Dilek Pekdemir, 2009.
"Comparison of Rent Prediction Models: Case of Istanbul Office Market,"
ERES
eres2009_158, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Handle:
RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_158
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.