IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2009_157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structural Vacancy of Office Buildings: The Influence of Building- and Location- Characteristics in the Case of Amsterdam

Author

Listed:
  • Hilde Remøy
  • Philip W. Koppels
  • Hans de Jonge

Abstract

Ever since the Second World War, office markets world-wide could be characterised as growth markets. Since 2000 though, financial and real estate crises and ìthe new way of workingî are reducing the need for office space, and office markets become replacement markets without a quantitative need for new office buildings: New buildings drive out bad buildings. In December 2008, the Amsterdam office market comprised 6.7 million m2, and an available supply of 1.2 million m2. 60% is classified as structurally vacant, meaning vacancy of the same square meters for three or more years, without perspective of future tenancy. Due to the current financial crisis and the construction of new buildings, the vacancy is expected to increase over the next few years. When relocating, organisations consider buildings and locations within geographically defined markets. Though location characteristics are important, eventually their choice depends on building characteristics. Organisations prefer office buildings that facilitate their main processes, and support their image and financial yield. In this study, we consider the revealed preferences of office organisations by relating structural vacancy to building and location characteristics. This paper will answer the following questions based on the Amsterdam case: which office buildings and locations are preferred by office users and which have the highest structural vacancy? Is structural vacancy related to specific building and location characteristics? Based on former studies we defined building- and location- characteristics that we expect to influence office user preferences. We studied the physical characteristics of 220 office buildings and applied regression analyses to explain the influence of specific characteristics on the office user preferences. Understanding office user preferences is important for understanding movements in replacement markets like the Amsterdam office market. In our study we reveal that building characteristics have a strong influence on office user preferences and should definitely be taken into account when developing new office buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilde Remøy & Philip W. Koppels & Hans de Jonge, 2009. "Structural Vacancy of Office Buildings: The Influence of Building- and Location- Characteristics in the Case of Amsterdam," ERES eres2009_157, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2009-157
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin Muldoon-Smith & Paul Greenhalgh, 2017. "Situations Vacant: A Conceptual Framework for Commercial Real Estate Vacancy," ERES eres2017_341, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2009_157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.