Author
Listed:
- Nicholas Anderson
- Juhani Kiiras
Abstract
Life-Cycle Contracts (LCC) commonly called PPP or PFI are typically relied upon for the financing and the execution of large infrastructure or building investments. A scope of LCC includes financing, design and engineering, construction, and operations and maintenance over the extended contract period, i.e. 20 or 30 years. The income of a LCC consists of payments based on the use of the constructed object in question. Under a LCC, the preparation of the tender documents, the engineering and the estimating of the bids, and the final selection of the contractor take long time and the process involves several problems. An investor remains tied to the contract terms, i.e. there is little flexibility to respond changes in the use of object or technology during a long contract period. The financing in LCC models are expensive and the model is like hire purchase. Thus, investors should have a possibility to choose from among several alternative procurement strategies. In this paper, the Life-Cycle Management model (LCM) is introduced as an alternative for LC contracts. Via this LCM, a public owner (investor) will get long-term financing with lower interest rate and all the savings to be gained through the competitive subcontracting of all project service or work packages and maintenance task packages. All subcontracts are procured from competitive markets. In addition, an investment process can be started earlier than in the case of LCC. However, the downside of the LCMS model involves a fact that an owner will carry all the project risks over its life cycle. In this paper are presented net present value calculations about some case projects procured by LCC or LCM models.
Suggested Citation
Nicholas Anderson & Juhani Kiiras, 2006.
"Are There Options To Ppp Or Pfi Procurement Models?,"
ERES
eres2006_111, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Handle:
RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_111
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.