IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2504.03594.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Flatness-Robust Critical Bandwidth

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Kostyshak

Abstract

Critical bandwidth (CB) is used to test the multimodality of densities and regression functions, as well as for clustering methods. CB tests are known to be inconsistent if the function of interest is constant ("flat") over even a small interval, and to suffer from low power and incorrect size in finite samples if the function has a relatively small derivative over an interval. This paper proposes a solution, flatness-robust CB (FRCB), that exploits the novel observation that the inconsistency manifests only from regions consistent with the null hypothesis, and thus identifying and excluding them does not alter the null or alternative sets. I provide sufficient conditions for consistency of FRCB, and simulations of a test of regression monotonicity demonstrate the finite-sample properties of FRCB compared with CB for various regression functions. Surprisingly, FRCB performs better than CB in some cases where there are no flat regions, which can be explained by FRCB essentially giving more importance to parts of the function where there are larger violations of the null hypothesis. I illustrate the usefulness of FRCB with an empirical analysis of the monotonicity of the conditional mean function of radiocarbon age with respect to calendar age.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Kostyshak, 2025. "Flatness-Robust Critical Bandwidth," Papers 2504.03594, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.03594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.03594
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.03594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.