Author
Listed:
- Qin Fang
- Shaojun Guo
- Yang Hong
- Xinghao Qiao
Abstract
Empirical likelihood serves as a powerful tool for constructing confidence intervals in nonparametric regression and regression discontinuity designs (RDD). The original empirical likelihood framework can be naturally extended to these settings using local linear smoothers, with Wilks' theorem holding only when an undersmoothed bandwidth is selected. However, the generalization of bias-corrected versions of empirical likelihood under more realistic conditions is non-trivial and has remained an open challenge in the literature. This paper provides a satisfactory solution by proposing a novel approach, referred to as robust empirical likelihood, designed for nonparametric regression and RDD. The core idea is to construct robust weights which simultaneously achieve bias correction and account for the additional variability introduced by the estimated bias, thereby enabling valid confidence interval construction without extra estimation steps involved. We demonstrate that the Wilks' phenomenon still holds under weaker conditions in nonparametric regression, sharp and fuzzy RDD settings. Extensive simulation studies confirm the effectiveness of our proposed approach, showing superior performance over existing methods in terms of coverage probabilities and interval lengths. Moreover, the proposed procedure exhibits robustness to bandwidth selection, making it a flexible and reliable tool for empirical analyses. The practical usefulness is further illustrated through applications to two real datasets.
Suggested Citation
Qin Fang & Shaojun Guo & Yang Hong & Xinghao Qiao, 2025.
"On Robust Empirical Likelihood for Nonparametric Regression with Application to Regression Discontinuity Designs,"
Papers
2504.01535, arXiv.org.
Handle:
RePEc:arx:papers:2504.01535
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.01535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.