IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2503.17156.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reallocating Wasted Votes in Proportional Parliamentary Elections with Thresholds

Author

Listed:
  • Th'eo Delemazure
  • Rupert Freeman
  • J'er^ome Lang
  • Jean-Franc{c}ois Laslier
  • Dominik Peters

Abstract

In many proportional parliamentary elections, electoral thresholds (typically 3-5%) are used to promote stability and governability by preventing the election of parties with very small representation. However, these thresholds often result in a significant number of "wasted votes" cast for parties that fail to meet the threshold, which reduces representativeness. One proposal is to allow voters to specify replacement votes, by either indicating a second choice party or by ranking a subset of the parties, but there are several ways of deciding on the scores of the parties (and thus the composition of the parliament) given those votes. We introduce a formal model of party voting with thresholds, and compare a variety of party selection rules axiomatically, and experimentally using a dataset we collected during the 2024 European election in France. We identify three particularly attractive rules, called Direct Winners Only (DO), Single Transferable Vote (STV) and Greedy Plurality (GP).

Suggested Citation

  • Th'eo Delemazure & Rupert Freeman & J'er^ome Lang & Jean-Franc{c}ois Laslier & Dominik Peters, 2025. "Reallocating Wasted Votes in Proportional Parliamentary Elections with Thresholds," Papers 2503.17156, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2503.17156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.17156
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2503.17156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.