IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2503.15186.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal Data Splitting for Holdout Cross-Validation in Large Covariance Matrix Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Lamia Lamrani
  • Christian Bongiorno
  • Marc Potters

Abstract

Cross-validation is a statistical tool that can be used to improve large covariance matrix estimation. Although its efficiency is observed in practical applications, the theoretical reasons behind it remain largely intuitive, with formal proofs currently lacking. To carry on analytical analysis, we focus on the holdout method, a single iteration of cross-validation, rather than the traditional $k$-fold approach. We derive a closed-form expression for the estimation error when the population matrix follows a white inverse Wishart distribution, and we observe the optimal train-test split scales as the square root of the matrix dimension. For general population matrices, we connected the error to the variance of eigenvalues distribution, but approximations are necessary. Interestingly, in the high-dimensional asymptotic regime, both the holdout and $k$-fold cross-validation methods converge to the optimal estimator when the train-test ratio scales with the square root of the matrix dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamia Lamrani & Christian Bongiorno & Marc Potters, 2025. "Optimal Data Splitting for Holdout Cross-Validation in Large Covariance Matrix Estimation," Papers 2503.15186, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2503.15186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.15186
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2503.15186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.