IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2503.00757.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wikipedia Contributions in the Wake of ChatGPT

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Lyu
  • James Siderius
  • Hannah Li
  • Daron Acemoglu
  • Daniel Huttenlocher
  • Asuman Ozdaglar

Abstract

How has Wikipedia activity changed for articles with content similar to ChatGPT following its introduction? We estimate the impact using differences-in-differences models, with dissimilar Wikipedia articles as a baseline for comparison, to examine how changes in voluntary knowledge contributions and information-seeking behavior differ by article content. Our analysis reveals that newly created, popular articles whose content overlaps with ChatGPT 3.5 saw a greater decline in editing and viewership after the November 2022 launch of ChatGPT than dissimilar articles did. These findings indicate heterogeneous substitution effects, where users selectively engage less with existing platforms when AI provides comparable content. This points to potential uneven impacts on the future of human-driven online knowledge contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Lyu & James Siderius & Hannah Li & Daron Acemoglu & Daniel Huttenlocher & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2025. "Wikipedia Contributions in the Wake of ChatGPT," Papers 2503.00757, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2503.00757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.00757
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2503.00757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.