IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2501.05278.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Off-Policy Evaluation and Counterfactual Methods in Dynamic Auction Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Ritam Guha
  • Nilavra Pathak

Abstract

Counterfactual estimators are critical for learning and refining policies using logged data, a process known as Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE). OPE allows researchers to assess new policies without costly experiments, speeding up the evaluation process. Online experimental methods, such as A/B tests, are effective but often slow, thus delaying the policy selection and optimization process. In this work, we explore the application of OPE methods in the context of resource allocation in dynamic auction environments. Given the competitive nature of environments where rapid decision-making is crucial for gaining a competitive edge, the ability to quickly and accurately assess algorithmic performance is essential. By utilizing counterfactual estimators as a preliminary step before conducting A/B tests, we aim to streamline the evaluation process, reduce the time and resources required for experimentation, and enhance confidence in the chosen policies. Our investigation focuses on the feasibility and effectiveness of using these estimators to predict the outcomes of potential resource allocation strategies, evaluate their performance, and facilitate more informed decision-making in policy selection. Motivated by the outcomes of our initial study, we envision an advanced analytics system designed to seamlessly and dynamically assess new resource allocation strategies and policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ritam Guha & Nilavra Pathak, 2025. "Off-Policy Evaluation and Counterfactual Methods in Dynamic Auction Environments," Papers 2501.05278, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.05278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.05278
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Milgrom, 2021. "Auction Research Evolving: Theorems and Market Designs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1383-1405, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Teytelboym & Shengwu Li & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour & Piotr Dworczak, 2021. "Discovering Auctions: Contributions of Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 123(3), pages 709-750, July.
    2. Thibaut Mastrolia & Tianrui Xu, 2025. "Optimal Rebate Design: Incentives, Competition and Efficiency in Auction Markets," Papers 2501.12591, arXiv.org.
    3. Matteo Aquilina & Eric Budish & Peter O’Neill, 2022. "Quantifying the High-Frequency Trading “Arms Race”," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(1), pages 493-564.
    4. Robert B. Wilson, 2021. "Strategic Analysis of Auctions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(2), pages 555-561, March.
    5. van Basshuysen, Philippe, 2023. "Markets, market algorithms, and algorithmic bias," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115694, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Ignacio Palacios-Huerta & David C. Parkes & Richard Steinberg, 2024. "Combinatorial Auctions in Practice," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 517-553, June.
    7. Eduardo Cardadeiro & João E. Gata, 2023. "Market-based allocation of airport slots: the PAUSE auction mechanism and extensions," Working Papers REM 2023/0260, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    8. Bingham, Logan & Boxall, Peter & Da Re, Riccardo & Whitten, Stuart & Knoke, Thomas & Borges, José G., 2024. "Advancing ecosystem services auctions: Insights from an international Delphi panel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.05278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.