IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2411.13783.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Process and Policy Insights from an Intercomparison of Open Electricity System Capacity Expansion Models

Author

Listed:
  • Greg Schivley
  • Aurora Barone
  • Michael Blackhurst
  • Patricia Hidalgo-Gonzalez
  • Jesse Jenkins
  • Oleg Lugovoy
  • Qian Luo
  • Michael J. Roberts
  • Rangrang Zheng
  • Cameron Wade
  • Matthias Fripp

Abstract

This study performs a detailed intercomparison of four open-source electricity capacity expansion models - Temoa, Switch, GenX, and USENSYS - to evaluate 1) how closely the results of these models align when inputs and configurations are harmonized, and 2) the degree to which varying model configurations affect outputs. We harmonize the inputs to each model using PowerGenome and use clearly defined scenarios (policy conditions) and configurations (model setup choices). This allows us to isolate how differences in model structure affect policy outcomes and investment decisions. Our framework allows each model to be tested on identical assumptions for policy, technology costs, and operational constraints, allowing us to focus on differences that arise from inherent model structures. Key findings highlight that, when harmonized, models produce very similar capacity portfolios under current policies and net-zero scenarios, with less than 1% difference in system costs for most configurations. This agreement among models allows us to focus on how configuration choices affect model results. For instance, configurations with unit commitment constraints or economic retirement yield different investments and system costs compared to simpler configurations. Our findings underscore the importance of aligning input data and transparently defining scenarios and configurations to provide robust policy insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Greg Schivley & Aurora Barone & Michael Blackhurst & Patricia Hidalgo-Gonzalez & Jesse Jenkins & Oleg Lugovoy & Qian Luo & Michael J. Roberts & Rangrang Zheng & Cameron Wade & Matthias Fripp, 2024. "Process and Policy Insights from an Intercomparison of Open Electricity System Capacity Expansion Models," Papers 2411.13783, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.13783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.13783
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.13783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.