IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2411.07604.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Evolutionary Game Analysis of How Fintech in Banking Mitigates Risks in Agricultural Supply Chain Finance

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Wan
  • Jun Cui

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of banking fintech on reducing financial risks in the agricultural supply chain, focusing on the secondary allocation of commercial credit. The study constructs a three-player evolutionary game model involving banks, core enterprises, and SMEs to analyze how fintech innovations, such as big data credit assessment, blockchain, and AI-driven risk evaluation, influence financial risks and access to credit. The findings reveal that banking fintech reduces financing costs and mitigates financial risks by improving transaction reliability, enhancing risk identification, and minimizing information asymmetry. By optimizing cooperation between banks, core enterprises, and SMEs, fintech solutions enhance the stability of the agricultural supply chain, contributing to rural revitalization goals and sustainable agricultural development. The study provides new theoretical insights and practical recommendations for improving agricultural finance systems and reducing financial risks. Keywords: banking fintech, agricultural supply chain, financial risk, commercial credit, SMEs, evolutionary game model, big data, blockchain, AI-driven risk evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Wan & Jun Cui, 2024. "Dynamic Evolutionary Game Analysis of How Fintech in Banking Mitigates Risks in Agricultural Supply Chain Finance," Papers 2411.07604, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.07604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.07604
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    banking fintech; agricultural supply chain; financial risk; commercial credit; smes; evolutionary game model; big data; blockchain; ai-driven risk evaluation.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.07604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.