IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2409.12551.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Ownership Structure Matter? A Case Study on Business Performance of Two Accounting Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Reetta Ghezzi
  • Sanni Marjanen
  • Teemu Laine
  • Tatu Virta
  • Hannu Vilpponen
  • Tommi Mikkonen

Abstract

Many public organisations procure a substantial amount of goods and services from in-house companies. When providing their goods and services, those companies are supposed to fulfil objectives set for them and for the wider entity, including in particular cost-effectiveness. This paper examines the performance of selected in-house companies both by analyzing the externally reported financial performance (top-down) and analyzing the internal operations and related performance (bottom-up). Based on the analysis, it is discussed, 1) how the in-house companies fulfil their assigned tasks as publicly owned entities and 2) how these in-house companies and their performance should be controlled by public bodies. Methodologically the paper takes advantage of two cases of accounting companies: one publicly owned in-house company and another private company. As a conclusion, in this case top-down analysis reveals inefficiencies which are further explored via bottom-up analysis. In this case, privatization leads to enhanced business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Reetta Ghezzi & Sanni Marjanen & Teemu Laine & Tatu Virta & Hannu Vilpponen & Tommi Mikkonen, 2024. "Does Ownership Structure Matter? A Case Study on Business Performance of Two Accounting Companies," Papers 2409.12551, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.12551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.12551
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.12551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.