IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2408.02973.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative analysis of stationarity for Bitcoin and the S&P500

Author

Listed:
  • Yaoyue Tang
  • Karina Arias-Calluari
  • Michael S. Harr'e

Abstract

This paper compares and contrasts stationarity between the conventional stock market and cryptocurrency. The dataset used for the analysis is the intraday price indices of the S&P500 from 1996 to 2023 and the intraday Bitcoin indices from 2019 to 2023, both in USD. We adopt the definition of `wide sense stationary', which constrains the time independence of the first and second moments of a time series. The testing method used in this paper follows the Wiener-Khinchin Theorem, i.e., that for a wide sense stationary process, the power spectral density and the autocorrelation are a Fourier transform pair. We demonstrate that localized stationarity can be achieved by truncating the time series into segments, and for each segment, detrending and normalizing the price return are required. These results show that the S&P500 price return can achieve stationarity for the full 28-year period with a detrending window of 12 months and a constrained normalization window of 10 minutes. With truncated segments, a larger normalization window can be used to establish stationarity, indicating that within the segment the data is more homogeneous. For Bitcoin price return, the segment with higher volatility presents stationarity with a normalization window of 60 minutes, whereas stationarity cannot be established in other segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaoyue Tang & Karina Arias-Calluari & Michael S. Harr'e, 2024. "Comparative analysis of stationarity for Bitcoin and the S&P500," Papers 2408.02973, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2408.02973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.02973
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2408.02973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.