IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2407.18687.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Set risk measures

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelo Righi
  • Eduardo Horta
  • Marlon Moresco

Abstract

We introduce the concept of set risk measures (SRMs), which are real-valued maps defined on the space of all non-empty, closed, and bounded sets of almost surely bounded random variables. Traditional risk measures typically operate on spaces of random variables, but SRMs extend this framework to sets of random variables. We establish an axiom scheme for SRMs, similar to classical risk measures but adapted for set operations. The main technical contribution is an axiomatic dual representation of convex SRMs by using regular, finitely additive measures on the unit ball of the dual space of essentially bounded random variables. We explore worst-case SRMs, which evaluate risk as the supremum of individual risks within a set, and provide a collection of examples illustrating the applicability of our framework to systemic risk, portfolio optimization, and decision-making under uncertainty. This work extends the theory of risk measures to a more general and flexible setup, accommodating a broader range of financial and mathematical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelo Righi & Eduardo Horta & Marlon Moresco, 2024. "Set risk measures," Papers 2407.18687, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2407.18687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.18687
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles Boevi Koumou & Georges Dionne, 2022. "Coherent Diversification Measures in Portfolio Theory: An Axiomatic Foundation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    3. Charalambos D. Aliprantis & Kim C. Border, 2006. "Infinite Dimensional Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-29587-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viet Anh Nguyen & Fan Zhang & Shanshan Wang & Jose Blanchet & Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2021. "Robustifying Conditional Portfolio Decisions via Optimal Transport," Papers 2103.16451, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    2. Andreas H. Hamel & Frank Heyde, 2021. "Set-Valued T -Translative Functions and Their Applications in Finance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-33, September.
    3. Acciaio Beatrice & Svindland Gregor, 2013. "Are law-invariant risk functions concave on distributions?," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2013), pages 54-64, December.
    4. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2021. "Risk measures beyond frictionless markets," Papers 2111.08294, arXiv.org.
    5. Samuel Drapeau & Michael Kupper, 2013. "Risk Preferences and Their Robust Representation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 28-62, February.
    6. Kountzakis, C. & Polyrakis, I.A., 2013. "Coherent risk measures in general economic models and price bubbles," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 201-209.
    7. Xia Han & Liyuan Lin & Ruodu Wang, 2023. "Diversification quotients based on VaR and ES," Papers 2301.03517, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    8. Han, Xia & Lin, Liyuan & Wang, Ruodu, 2023. "Diversification quotients based on VaR and ES," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 185-197.
    9. Michel Baes & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2017. "Existence, uniqueness and stability of optimal portfolios of eligible assets," Papers 1702.01936, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    10. Wang, Ruodu & Wei, Yunran, 2020. "Characterizing optimal allocations in quantile-based risk sharing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 288-300.
    11. Michel Baes & Cosimo Munari, 2020. "A continuous selection for optimal portfolios under convex risk measures does not always exist," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 5-23, February.
    12. Farkas, Walter & Koch-Medina, Pablo & Munari, Cosimo, 2014. "Capital requirements with defaultable securities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 58-67.
    13. Pichler, Alois, 2013. "The natural Banach space for version independent risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 405-415.
    14. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Gregor Svindland, 2018. "Risk sharing for capital requirements with multidimensional security markets," Papers 1809.10015, arXiv.org.
    15. Koch-Medina, Pablo & Munari, Cosimo & Svindland, Gregor, 2018. "Which eligible assets are compatible with comonotonic capital requirements?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 18-26.
    16. Keita Owari, 2013. "Maximum Lebesgue Extension of Monotone Convex Functions," CARF F-Series CARF-F-315, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    17. Tiexin Guo & Erxin Zhang & Mingzhi Wu & Bixuan Yang & George Yuan & Xiaolin Zeng, 2016. "On random convex analysis," Papers 1603.07074, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    18. Romain Blanchard & Laurence Carassus, 2017. "Convergence of utility indifference prices to the superreplication price in a multiple-priors framework," Papers 1709.09465, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    19. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    20. Marcelo Brutti Righi, 2017. "Closed spaces induced by deviation measures," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1781-1784.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2407.18687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.