IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1905.06722.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The professional trader's paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Berdondini

Abstract

In this article, I will present a paradox whose purpose is to draw your attention to an important topic in finance, concerning the non-independence of the financial returns (non-ergodic hypothesis). In this paradox, we have two people sitting at a table separated by a black sheet so that they cannot see each other and are playing the following game: the person we call A flip a coin and the person we'll call B tries to guess the outcome of the coin flip. At the end of the game, both people are asked to estimate the compound probability of the result obtained. The two people give two different answers, one estimates the events as independent and the other one considers the events as dependent therefore they calculate the conditional probability differently. This paradox show how the erroneous estimation of conditional probability implies a strong distortion of the forecasting skill that can lead us to bear excessive risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Berdondini, 2019. "The professional trader's paradox," Papers 1905.06722, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1905.06722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.06722
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Berdondini, 2019. "Resolution of the St. Petersburg paradox using Von Mises axiom of randomness," Papers 1907.11054, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1905.06722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.