Author
Listed:
- Alok Raj
- J Ajith Kumar
- Prateek Bansal
Abstract
The automation technology is emerging, but the adoption rate of autonomous vehicles (AV) will largely depend upon how policymakers and the government address various challenges such as public acceptance and infrastructure development. This study proposes a five-step method to understand these barriers to AV adoption. First, based on a literature review followed by discussions with experts, ten barriers are identified. Second, the opinions of eighteen experts from industry and academia regarding inter-relations between these barriers are recorded. Third, a multicriteria decision making (MCDM) technique, the grey-based Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Grey-DEMATEL), is applied to characterize the structure of relationships between the barriers. Fourth, robustness of the results is tested using sensitivity analysis. Fifth, the key results are depicted in a causal loop diagram (CLD), a systems thinking approach, to comprehend cause-and-effect relationships between the barriers. The results indicate that the lack of customer acceptance (LCA) is the most prominent barrier, the one which should be addressed at the highest priority. The CLD suggests that LCA can be rather mitigated by addressing two other prominent, yet more tangible, barriers -- lack of industry standards and the absence of regulations and certifications. The study's overarching contribution thus lies in bringing to fore multiple barriers to AV adoption and their potential influences on each other. Moreover, the insights from this study can help associations related to AVs prioritize their endeavors to expedite AV adoption. From the methodological perspective, this is the first study in transportation literature that integrates Grey-DEMATEL with systems thinking.
Suggested Citation
Alok Raj & J Ajith Kumar & Prateek Bansal, 2019.
"A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach to Study the Barriers to the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles,"
Papers
1904.12051, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
Handle:
RePEc:arx:papers:1904.12051
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1904.12051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.