IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1904.02058.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Hospital Data Breaches Reduce Patient Care Quality?

Author

Listed:
  • Sung J. Choi
  • M. Eric Johnson

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the relationship between a hospital data breach and hospital quality outcome Materials and Methods: Hospital data breaches reported to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services breach portal and the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse database were merged with the Medicare Hospital Compare data to assemble a panel of non-federal acutecare inpatient hospitals for years 2011 to 2015. The study panel included 2,619 hospitals. Changes in 30-day AMI mortality rate following a hospital data breach were estimated using a multivariate regression model based on a difference-in-differences approach. Results: A data breach was associated with a 0.338[95% CI, 0.101-0.576] percentage point increase in the 30-day AMI mortality rate in the year following the breach and a 0.446[95% CI, 0.164-0.729] percentage point increase two years after the breach. For comparison, the median 30-day AMI mortality rate has been decreasing about 0.4 percentage points annually since 2011 due to progress in care. The magnitude of the breach impact on hospitals' AMI mortality rates was comparable to a year's worth historical progress in reducing AMI mortality rates. Conclusion: Hospital data breaches significantly increased the 30-day mortality rate for AMI. Data breaches may disrupt the processes of care that rely on health information technology. Financial costs to repair a breach may also divert resources away from patient care. Thus breached hospitals should carefully focus investments in security procedures, processes, and health information technology that jointly lead to better data security and improved patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung J. Choi & M. Eric Johnson, 2019. "Do Hospital Data Breaches Reduce Patient Care Quality?," Papers 1904.02058, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1904.02058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.02058
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey S. McCullough & Stephen T. Parente & Robert Town, 2013. "Health Information Technology and Patient Outcomes: The Role of Organizational and Informational Complementarities," NBER Working Papers 18684, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seth Freedman & Haizhen Lin & Jeffrey Prince, 2018. "Does Competition Lead to Agglomeration or Dispersion in EMR Vendor Decisions?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(1), pages 57-79, August.
    2. Amalia R. Miller & Catherine Tucker, 2017. "Frontiers of Health Policy: Digital Data and Personalized Medicine," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(1), pages 49-75.
    3. Dranove, David & Garthwaite, Craig & Li, Bingyang & Ody, Christopher, 2015. "Investment subsidies and the adoption of electronic medical records in hospitals," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 309-319.
    4. Ana Pinto Borges & Claudia Cardoso, 2013. "The ICT use in the implementation of Directive 2011/24/EU," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 44-52, June.
    5. García-Romero, Antonio & Escribano, Álvaro & Tribó, Josep A., 2017. "The impact of health research on length of stay in Spanish public hospitals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 591-604.
    6. Seth Freedman & Haizhen Lin & Jeffrey Prince, 2018. "Information Technology and Patient Health: Analyzing Outcomes, Populations, and Mechanisms," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 51-79, Winter.
    7. Andrew I. Friedson, 2018. "Medical Scribes as an Input in Health-Care Production: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(4), pages 479-503, Fall.
    8. Seth Freedman & Haizhen Lin & Jeffrey T. Prince, 2014. "Information Technology and Patient Health: An Expanded Analysis of Outcomes, Populations, and Mechanisms," Working Papers 2014-02, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    9. Carole Roan Gresenz & Scott P. Laughery & Amalia Miller & Catherine E Tucker, 2015. "Health IT and Ambulatory Care Quality," Working Papers WR-1131, RAND Corporation.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1904.02058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.