IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1004.1759.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Valuation Bound of Tranche Options

Author

Listed:
  • Yadong Li
  • Ariye Shater

Abstract

We performed a comprehensive analysis on the price bounds of CDO tranche options, and illustrated that the CDO tranche option prices can be effectively bounded by the joint distribution of default time (JDDT) from a default time copula. Systemic and idiosyncratic factors beyond the JDDT only contribute a limited amount of pricing uncertainty. The price bounds of tranche option derived from a default time copula are often very narrow, especially for the senior part of the capital structure where there is the most market interests for tranche options. The tranche option bounds from a default time copula can often be computed semi-analytically without Monte Carlo simulation, therefore it is feasible and practical to price and risk manage senior CDO tranche options using the price bounds from a default time copula only. CDO tranche option pricing is important in a number of practical situations such as counterparty, gap or liquidation risk; the methodology described in this paper can be very useful in the above described situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yadong Li & Ariye Shater, 2010. "Valuation Bound of Tranche Options," Papers 1004.1759, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1004.1759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.1759
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    2. Li, Yadong, 2009. "A Dynamic Correlation Modelling Framework with Consistent Stochastic Recovery," MPRA Paper 14919, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Apr 2009.
    3. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    4. Lando, David & Nielsen, Mads Stenbo, 2010. "Correlation in corporate defaults: Contagion or conditional independence?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 355-372, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Tim, 2013. "The Impact of Default Dependency and Collateralization on Asset Pricing and Credit Risk Modeling," MPRA Paper 47136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Xiao, Tim, 2018. "The Valuation of Credit Default Swap with Counterparty Risk and Collateralization," EconStor Preprints 203447, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Xiao,Tim, 2018. "Pricing Financial Derivatives Subject to Multilateral Credit Risk and Collateralization," EconStor Preprints 202075, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. White, Alan, 2018. "Pricing Credit Default Swap Subject to Counterparty Risk and Collateralization," MPRA Paper 85331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Tim, Xiao, 2019. "Pricing Credit Default Swap Subject to Counterparty Risk and Collateralization," MPRA Paper 94701, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Alan White, 2018. "Pricing Credit Default Swap Subject to Counterparty Risk and Collateralization," Papers 1803.07843, arXiv.org.
    7. Alan White, 2018. "Pricing Credit Default Swap Subject to Counterparty Risk and Collateralization," Working Papers hal-01739310, HAL.
    8. Beliaeva, Natalia & Nawalkha, Sanjay, 2012. "Pricing American interest rate options under the jump-extended constant-elasticity-of-variance short rate models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 151-163.
    9. Weihan Li & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan & Pakorn Aschakulporn, 2024. "An empirical study on the early exercise premium of American options: Evidence from OEX and XEO options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1117-1153, July.
    10. Seyed Amir Hejazi & Kenneth R. Jackson, 2016. "A Neural Network Approach to Efficient Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities," Papers 1606.07831, arXiv.org.
    11. Zeng, Yaxiong & Klabjan, Diego & Arinez, Jorge, 2015. "Distributed solar renewable generation: Option contracts with renewable energy credit uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 295-305.
    12. Lorenzo Garlappi & Georgios Skoulakis, 2009. "Numerical Solutions to Dynamic Portfolio Problems: The Case for Value Function Iteration using Taylor Approximation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 193-207, March.
    13. Aleksandar Arandjelovi'c & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Tomoko Matsui & Daisuke Murakami & Tor A. Myrvoll, 2024. "Solving stochastic climate-economy models: A deep least-squares Monte Carlo approach," Papers 2408.09642, arXiv.org.
    14. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    15. Pietersz, R. & Pelsser, A.A.J., 2003. "Risk managing bermudan swaptions in the libor BGM model," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2003-33, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    16. Work, James & Hauer, Grant & Luckert, M.K. (Marty), 2018. "What ethanol prices would induce growers to switch from agriculture to poplar in Alberta? A multiple options approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 51-62.
    17. Adam W. Kolkiewicz & Fangyuan Sally Lin, 2017. "Pricing Surrender Risk in Ratchet Equity-Index Annuities under Regime-Switching Lévy Processes," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 433-457, July.
    18. Mo, Jianlei & Schleich, Joachim & Fan, Ying, 2018. "Getting ready for future carbon abatement under uncertainty – Key factors driving investment with policy implications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 453-464.
    19. Zhu, Yichen & Escobar-Anel, Marcos, 2022. "Polynomial affine approach to HARA utility maximization with applications to OrnsteinUhlenbeck 4/2 models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    20. Kathrin Glau & Ricardo Pachon & Christian Potz, 2019. "Speed-up credit exposure calculations for pricing and risk management," Papers 1912.01280, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1004.1759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.