IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2003022.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The writing processes and learning strategies of initial users of speech recognition. A case study on the adaptation process of two professional writers

Author

Listed:
  • LEIJTEN, Mariëlle
  • VAN WAES, Luuk

Abstract

This paper describes the adaptation and learning process of writers who have started using speech recognition systems for writing business texts. To gather the process data for this study we have chosen complementary research methods. First the participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire, then they received instruction in the speech recognition system, they were observed five times using the speech recognition system during their day-to-day work and filled in a logging questionnaire after each task. The data from these sessions were used to describe the adaptation strategies during the learning process by revealing the planning, formulating and reviewing behaviour of the writers. This article focuses on (1) the effect of speech recognition on cognitive processes of writers; (2) the learning strategies of initial users; (3) the description of a research method, categorization model and notation model to answer research questions as extensively as possible. To illustrate the possibilities of the categorization model we describe a case study in which we show the learning and writing process of two experienced dictators. Both writers have a comparable experience in professional writing, word processing and classical dictating. However, they do differ in learning style (cf. Kolb 1984). The case study shows that this difference in learning style is decisive in the adaptation process and because of this it also shows that the used method enabled us to describe these kind of writing process data adequately.

Suggested Citation

  • LEIJTEN, Mariëlle & VAN WAES, Luuk, "undated". "The writing processes and learning strategies of initial users of speech recognition. A case study on the adaptation process of two professional writers," Working Papers 2003022, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2003022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/6597d9/1a78582f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Writing processes; Learning strategies; Speech recognition; Research method; Writing modes;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2003022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.