IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anp/en2010/187.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Qualidade Das Instituições E Pib Percapita Nos Municípios Brasileiros

Author

Listed:
  • ANA ELISA GONÇALVES PEREIRA

    (UFPR)

  • LUCIANO NAKABASHI

    (UFPR)

  • ADOLFO SACHSIDA

    (IPEA E IBMEC-DF)

Abstract

The Brazilian municipalities show a huge disparity in income level. The GDP per capita difference between the richest and the poorest municipalities is about 190 times, according to IBGE (2000) database. Institutionalist theory provides a plausible explanation for the gap among municipalities income level. Many empirical studies based on cross-country data have found a high correlation between institutional quality and the level of economic development, but there is little research concerning the extreme inequality within the national territory and its relationship with institutional quality. The theory suggests that the institutions matter for the level of economic development because of their effects on political power distribution, generation of economic opportunities, innovation, human capital accumulation, and so on. Considering the above mentioned theory, the present study analyzes the impacts of Brazilian municipalities institutional quality on their levels of per capita income.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Elisa Gonçalves Pereira & Luciano Nakabashi & Adolfo Sachsida, 2011. "Qualidade Das Instituições E Pib Percapita Nos Municípios Brasileiros," Anais do XXXVIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 38th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 187, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    • Handle: RePEc:anp:en2010:187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anpec.org.br/encontro2010/inscricao/arquivos/000-39ba8a16990e91b6488fd120100d755c.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anp:en2010:187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rodrigo Zadra Armond (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/anpecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.