IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anc/wpaper/84.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conoscenza e informazione in F.A. von Hayek

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano FIORI

    ([n.a.])

Abstract

La tesi sostenuta in questo lavoro Š che nell'opera di Hayek vi siano non una, ma due nozioni di conoscenza. La prima Š una conoscenza informazionale consistente in un insieme di dati dispersi fra una molteplicita' di agenti. La seconda Š una conoscenza potenziale, conosciuta nella letteratura come "conoscenza inarticolata", la quale si manifesta come capacita' di utilizzare e rielaborare proficuamente i dati esogeni. Dall'analisi differenziata dei due tipi di conoscenza ha luogo la rivisitazione del concetto hayekiano di "ordine spontaneo" di mercato. Nel corso dell'esposizione si mostra, inoltre, come la "conoscenza tacita" di M. Polanyi differisca dalla conoscenza inarticolata di Hayek. Intine, si cerca di evidenziare come, fin dall'opera di A. Smith, la distinzione fra conoscenza e informazione ponga importanti quesiti circa il funzionamento del mercato autoregolato; quesiti che, con le dovute differenze, si ripropongono all'interno della teoria hayekiana.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano FIORI, 1996. "Conoscenza e informazione in F.A. von Hayek," Working Papers 84, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    • Handle: RePEc:anc:wpaper:84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://docs.dises.univpm.it/web/quaderni/pdf/084.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1996
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fiori Stefano, 2005. "The emergence of instructions : some open problems in Hayek's theory," CESMEP Working Papers 200504, University of Turin.
    2. Stefano Fiori, 2006. "The emergence of institutions in Hayek’s theory: two views or one?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 49-61, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anc:wpaper:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maurizio Mariotti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deancit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.